Bullying / Organized Stalking / Gang Stalking / Cause Stalking / Animal Abuse / NOH8

Here are just a few people in this Preamble that have been dealing with these forms of harassment and assault too.

Please sign this Petition, let's stop the HURT!

Sunday, July 13, 2011
Stop Gang Stalking flyer:
STOP GANG STALKING

Gang stalking (also called "group stalking," "terrorist stalking," "vigilante stalking," "organized stalking," "community-based harassment," and "cause stalking") is a total-assault paradigm, a parallel "justice system." It is carried out by right-wing hate-extremist groups. The gang stalking paradigm includes (but is not limited to):

•verbal threats

•pets are killed.

•physical assault

•derogatory name calling

•harassing emails and phone calls

•mail is stolen, damaged, or delayed.

•residences and vehicles are vandalized.

•the stalkers commit crimes and blame them on the target.

•targets are harassed while driving, and vehicles are sabotaged.

•the same harassment happens every day, day after day, year after year.

•a large group of stalkers, each of whom does a portion of the stalking-attacks

•black and white patrol cars, fire dept. vehicles, and taxis follow the target around.

•persistence: the stalkers follow the target as he/she moves to other cities or states.

•some law enforcement officers and firefighters participate in the stalking-harassment.

•the stalkers use lies, money, and intimidation to get nongroup members to attack the target.

•goals: Identify, Vilify, Nullify, and Destroy the target: from "Cause Stalking" by David Lawson

•many of the attacks are synchronized to happen precisely as the target does something, e.g. leaves his/her residence.

•24 hour surveillance, every day. Among other things, the stalkers, working in shifts, sit in their vehicles parked around the target's residence.

•disinformation: stalkers will present themselves as gang-stalking victims and make bizarre claims to discredit other victims and mislead the public.

•"street theater": staged skits designed to frighten and upset the target. In aggressive versions, the target is physically assaulted while the other stalkers act as "witnesses."

•"slander campaign": the foundation of gs. The stalkers go to everyone the target interacts with (family members, coworkers, neighbors, etc) and spread lies: that the target is a homosexual or a criminal of some type. This is an effective tactic because most people can't even imagine that a stranger would lie to them.

•the stalkers present themselves as members of a "civic organization" which works with law enforcement and monitors terrorists or other criminals. The stalkers may use fake badges or fake "official files" to convince people that the target is a criminal.

•"noise campaign": very frequent sounds (sirens, car alarms, beeping sounds, loud engine accelerations, loud booming sounds [from vehicles], etc) which follow the target everywhere.

•the stalkers target people they see as not conforming with their version of "normality," homosexuals, members of "left-wing" (e.g. peace, civil rights, environmental) organizations, whistleblowers, people who live "alternative lifestyles" or have angered a member of the group, and "targets of opportunity."

Resources:

•www.multistalkervictims.org/

•www.gangstalkingworld.com/

•http://groups.yahoo.com/group/multistalk/

•"Terrorist Stalking in America" (2001) by David Lawson

•"Protectors of Privilege" by Frank Donner at www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/4780.html

•weekly gang stalking conference call: 1-218-862-6400 4436672#: Friday 6pm Pacific time.

•"My Life Changed Forever: The Years I Have Lost as a Target of Organized Stalking" (2008) by Elizabeth Sullivan, at www.amazon.com/

•"Cause Stalking" (2007) by David Lawson P.I., the best single source of information on gang stalking, at www.causestalking.net/ or www.amazon.com/
posted by nomen at 7:38 PM

2 Comments:
hagnismos said...
There are alot of good people who are totally unaware that this is going on. Keep up the fight. The biggest weapon you have is the truth and the light of day.

I am going to be blogging about this in the near future and your site has helped encourage my coverage of this.

I did want to mention that is not simply right-wing groups doing this. There are groups from all across the political spectrum and having all different motives for their efforts. Is it possible that greater powers are working the groups against each other? It is possible, this was done in Maoist China. The techniques of mobbing are not new so we have the historical case studies to work from.

So far I see the following ideologies at work: religious extremist groups, neo-nazi groups, extreme left groups (vigilante lefters), and possibly element of our own government. Since it is possible for those in government to have an agenda, it is possible for members of the police to be involved. What we are talking about is a layer of power in society that can subvert traditional forms of authority to its own ends. We might call it corruption, but it is this and more.

Sincerely,

An Observer.

8:19 AM
Mary Lou said...
My children and I have experienced every single one of the things you list here, and we've endured this for over 11 years now. I too blog about our experiences at "Victims Of Organized Crime In Central Texas" http://vocct.blogspot.com. Ours is the nightmare that never ends.

10:47 PM
Post a Comment

<< Home
Previous Posts
Harassing Emails
Quote:"Groups consider themselves to be investigat...
Mark M. Rich's Letter to Targets
Hello. I am being stalked, harassed and assaulted....

There is growing problem of unauthorized or covert use advanced high-tech spy devices (cameras, snooping devices, Electromagnetic emission devices, web cams etc.) which track A-Z of any person's activity - speech, writing, bodily movements, computer and web usage (cyber-stalking) etc, even in darkness - from a considerable distance away (from neighboring buildings, distant buildings etc). Use of these devices is becoming a common feature among ordinary people, for criminal purposes, stalking, eavesdropping on other's private activities, computer hacking, vocal conversation, telephone conversation etc - in gross violation of:

1. The Indian Supreme Court ruling on wire-tapping/illegal surveillance

2. IT 2000 law prohibiting computer hacking

These devices are latest advances in technology; making both the Supreme Court ruling as well as the IT law "outdated" in comparison. It is very hard for an ordinary citizen to build evidence for court submission, when confronted by these invisible "covert" monitoring.

Public Interest Litigation on the following capital crimes - Indian laws and punishment required
1. Use of wireless spy devices/Electromagnetic emission devices/web cams for predatory or sexual purposes
2. Stalking/Cyber stalking/International stalking
3. Web pages - Content modification using stolen passwords obtained through wireless spy devices, web cams
Your Honor, based on your official position, please do whatever is needful to bring in proper laws and support mechanisms to prevent the misuse of such high tech wireless spy devices, web cams etc. for wiretapping, phone-tapping, computer hacking, cyber crimes, privacy and human rights violation.

NOTE* Animals have a right to live.These perps are killing animals just to make the owner/victim of Stalking suffer while they sit back and enjoy seeing the person hurt and grieve.Please, if you don't want to sign this Petition then recommend it.Thank you!
Stalking

Penal Code § 646.9. (a) Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly
follows or willfully and maliciously harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison.

(b) Any person who violates subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order, injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years.

(c) (1) Every person who, after having been convicted of a felony under Section 273.5, 273.6, or 422, commits a violation of subdivision (a) shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or five years.
(2) Every person who, after having been convicted of a felony under subdivision (a), commits a violation of this section shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or five years.

(d) In addition to the penalties provided in this section, the sentencing court may order a person convicted of a felony under this section to register as a sex offender pursuant to Section 290.006.

(e) For the purposes of this section, "harasses" means engages in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose.

(f) For the purposes of this section, "course of conduct" means two or more acts occurring over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "course of conduct."

(g) For the purposes of this section, "credible threat" means a verbal or written threat, including that performed through the use of an electric communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear of his or her safety, or the safety of his or her family, and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant has the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarnation of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of "credible threat."

(h) For purposes of this ection, the term "electronic communication device" includes but is not limited to, telephones, cell ophones, computers, video recorders, fax machines or pagers.

(i) this section shall not apply to conduct that occurs during labor picketing.

(k) (1) The sentencing court also shall consider issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact eith the victim, that may be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. It is the intent of the legislaturethat the length of any restraining order be based upon the seriousness of the facts before the court, the probability of future violations, and the safety of the victim and his or her immediate family.
(2) This protective order may be issued by the court wheather the defendant is sentenced to state prison, county jail, or if imposition of sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------