The Cookham Plan proposal for a road across Poundfield Petition: Signature List Feed http://www.gopetition.com/signatures/the-cookham-plan-proposal-for-a-road-across-poundfield.html Online petition signatures en-us Sun, 12 Apr 2026 07:19 UTC GoPetition RSS Feed Generator Copyright 2026 GoPetition Mr Charles Brealey [Signature #386] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/19407619?utm_medium=rss Thu, 22 Oct 2015 08:30:50 UTC 19407619 Mr Mike Simmonds [Signature #385] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3313753?utm_medium=rss Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:39:47 UTC 3313753 Mrs Lucy Samways [Signature #384] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3266557?utm_medium=rss Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:09:06 UTC 3266557 Ms Monique Tobin [Signature #383] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3266275?utm_medium=rss Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:23:29 UTC 3266275 Mr Roger Samways [Signature #382] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3243566?utm_medium=rss I formally object to the recently publicised "Cookham Plan" which provides for changes to the road infrastructure in Cookham on the basis that this is likely to attract a significant increase in vehicle traffic to the village and materially impact some of its key characteristics.

]]> Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:06:47 UTC 3243566 mrs Diane Evans [Signature #381] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3236261?utm_medium=rss This is inappropriate development of an historic thameside village of national and international importance (Sir Stanley Spencer's 'village made in heaven' ). The response to increased traffic pressure in a residential village is not to build more commuter roads in the heart of the community at the considerable expense of community, residents and visitors quality of life. These village roads, footpaths and green spaces are a valuable amenity for residents and visitors alike.

]]> Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:26:04 UTC 3236261 Mr Douglas Bay [Signature #380] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3215075?utm_medium=rss The proposal to move the Cookham Moor Car Park "closer to the village" adjacent to the Fire Station is an absolute nonsense indicating ill conceived lack of consideration for residents of Cookham Village.
The Pound One Way system reeks of disjointed planning and cronyism which will ultimately encourage addition unnecessary housing and development

]]> Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:54:17 UTC 3215075 John Waller [Signature #379] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3208683?utm_medium=rss Don't wreck this beautiful village

]]> Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:47:44 UTC 3208683 Mrs Thalia Kenton [Signature #378] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3188796?utm_medium=rss Thu, 6 Mar 2008 06:14:41 UTC 3188796 Miss Clare Simmonds [Signature #377] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3188095?utm_medium=rss It's a village, have a heart, the villiage does.
Once this Bypass is in place, more housing etc the tranquil villiages will never be the same. They will be lost forever. When I come home to Cookham and Cookham Dean it would be so devistating to see it ruined. For the sake of all the locals, Please don't do this new road.

]]> Thu, 6 Mar 2008 04:46:37 UTC 3188095 Mrs Sue Roberts [Signature #376] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3119742?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:18:50 UTC 3119742 Mr Max Gardiner [Signature #375] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3107252?utm_medium=rss Cookham would be a greater rat run. It is Maidenhead which needs a relief road for its own traffic for which Cookham suffers – why is this issue never raised?
ANY development of Poundfield would be disastrous. The riding school field is the only open space between Cookham Dean and the Moor, giving an essential green break between old and new Cookham.
Even a lit rear footpath would urbanise the Pound and who would use it? It would be further to walk, also schoolchildren are safer when in view

]]> Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:05:08 UTC 3107252 mrs Caroline Collins [Signature #374] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3096792?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:45:06 UTC 3096792 Mr Paul Robins [Signature #373] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3038188?utm_medium=rss Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:45:50 UTC 3038188 mrs carol hogg [Signature #372] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3036877?utm_medium=rss they will ruin cookham by over development .its a shame they dont think of the old cookham and its historic features, and put the residence first and not financing their own greed.

]]> Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:08:46 UTC 3036877 Mr Jeremy Green [Signature #371] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3027445?utm_medium=rss Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:52:58 UTC 3027445 Mrs Carolyn Morrissey [Signature #370] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3023521?utm_medium=rss Th.is is a site of Art History importance

]]> Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:26:46 UTC 3023521 Mrs Celia Jones [Signature #369] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3018534?utm_medium=rss This is a very special area and should not be spoilt.

]]> Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:02:35 UTC 3018534 Mr Robert Jones [Signature #368] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3018524?utm_medium=rss This would be an environmental disaster.

]]> Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:01:13 UTC 3018524 mr David John Fricker [Signature #367] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3016892?utm_medium=rss I have been visiting both by road and river Cookham since the 1960's and have walked all around the area of the pound and I think any development of the Poundfield area,would spoil the unic enviroment between the river and that part of Cookham.

]]> Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:06:38 UTC 3016892 mr Rod Gauld [Signature #366] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3012269?utm_medium=rss Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:16:41 UTC 3012269 mrs susan gauld [Signature #365] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3012242?utm_medium=rss Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:10:47 UTC 3012242 Mrs Sue Young [Signature #364] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/3001085?utm_medium=rss Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:55:30 UTC 3001085 Mr Mark Anderson [Signature #363] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2997242?utm_medium=rss This will only serve to increase the volume of traffic and the speed of the traffic which is already unsuitable for the roads around here. This is not in the best interest of Cookham as if you improve the flow through it will only result in more people using it as a rat run including the large lorries which should be encouraged to use more appropriate routes if they are not delivering in the area, also maybe deliveries should be made out of rush hour times. Don't create a better race track!!!

]]> Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:42:29 UTC 2997242 Annie Williams [Signature #362] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2989288?utm_medium=rss Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:03:17 UTC 2989288 Dr Michael Amphlett [Signature #361] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2979553?utm_medium=rss Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:30:24 UTC 2979553 Mrs Cheryl Brickell [Signature #360] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2979285?utm_medium=rss This proposal will create many more problems than it is designed to cure. Running a road through Poundifeld will lay it open to the possibility of further redevelopment, which in the long term would put an increasing strain on the village infrastructure. Improving traffic flow through the Pound, in this way, will only encourage more traffic to use the route resulting in more congestion on connecting roads.

]]> Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:41:07 UTC 2979285 Mr Andy Brickell [Signature #359] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2979241?utm_medium=rss This proposal will creat many more problems than it is designed to cure. I do not feel the width of the Pound is a problem. Improving traffic flow through it will only increase the volume of traffic using this route and further choke connecting roads.

]]> Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:31:52 UTC 2979241 Mrs Julie Harrison [Signature #358] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2975285?utm_medium=rss We need to be looking at ways of discouraging traffic, especially large vehicles, not trying to make it easier for traffic to use Cookham as a cut through. The new proposals will increase the travelling distance of traffic through Cookham, thereby increasing and spreading pollution. I’m not against change, but I am against this proposal.

]]> Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:58:59 UTC 2975285 Mrs Jean Garrett [Signature #357] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2974689?utm_medium=rss Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:16:20 UTC 2974689 Mr Martin Garrett [Signature #356] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2974679?utm_medium=rss Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:13:34 UTC 2974679 ms Jeanne Orchard [Signature #355] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2973507?utm_medium=rss Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:52:23 UTC 2973507 Mr Ian Smith [Signature #354] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2968090?utm_medium=rss Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:03:40 UTC 2968090 Ms Anonymous [Signature #353] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2956260?utm_medium=rss Having grown up in Cookham I think it's awful they're erroding such a beautiful village by building more houses. No one seems to value the countryside anymore.

]]> Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:08:23 UTC 2956260 Ms A Levy [Signature #352] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2954273?utm_medium=rss Fri, 8 Feb 2008 05:16:31 UTC 2954273 Tim Dickson [Signature #351] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2953907?utm_medium=rss Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:13:24 UTC 2953907 Mrs. Susan Seymour [Signature #350] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2953526?utm_medium=rss Fri, 8 Feb 2008 03:15:43 UTC 2953526 Mrs Annette Felix [Signature #349] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2949402?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:38:03 UTC 2949402 mrs. Francoise Raison [Signature #348] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2948733?utm_medium=rss The countryside is diminishing rapidly and if this area of outstanding beauty,especially so close to London,is spoilt,we and our chidren will be suffering a great loss.

]]> Thu, 7 Feb 2008 11:57:13 UTC 2948733 Ms B Coombes [Signature #347] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2947124?utm_medium=rss routing traffice through Terrys Lane will just lead to additional time to journeys

]]> Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:12:57 UTC 2947124 Mr Anonymous [Signature #346] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2947103?utm_medium=rss this would add too much time to my journey. Please find an alternative solution.

]]> Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:09:24 UTC 2947103 Mrs Anonymous [Signature #345] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2947094?utm_medium=rss This is an unworkable solution. Alternative location must be found for housing. Terrys Lane cannot accommodate additional traffice it would be too dangerous. The route suggested would add too much time to routes through Cookham

]]> Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:08:18 UTC 2947094 Mras Anonymous [Signature #344] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2947079?utm_medium=rss This is a dangerous option - Terrys Lane is unequipped to deal with significant traffic - the road is too narrow. To take a road through poundfield is just adding too much pressure to an overused road. An alternative solution needs to be thought of.
Alternative sites must be used for housing and not the poundfield sites, we don't have the infrastructure to deal with an additional housing estate in Cookham.

]]> Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:06:10 UTC 2947079 mr tony seager [Signature #343] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2946416?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:36:28 UTC 2946416 Mr Graham Lucas [Signature #342] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2945780?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Feb 2008 05:05:15 UTC 2945780 Mrs Ann Howard [Signature #341] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2945670?utm_medium=rss As my husband has stated the character of Cookham would be severely altered if this development were to be allowed.

]]> Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:46:25 UTC 2945670 Mr Stewart Howard [Signature #340] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2945640?utm_medium=rss Having lived in Cookham and attend Holy Trinity Church it would be devastating to have the Poundfield area developed. It would completely change the face of Cookham.

]]> Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:41:59 UTC 2945640 Mrs Jane Walne [Signature #339] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2945559?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:24:58 UTC 2945559 Miss Marie Kemp [Signature #338] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2945498?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:12:57 UTC 2945498 Miss Anonymous [Signature #337] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2945489?utm_medium=rss Please do not ruin the lives of the people effected by this proposed development - Shame on you

]]> Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:11:49 UTC 2945489 miss Isabelle Gales [Signature #336] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2945482?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:10:44 UTC 2945482 miss melanie tanner [Signature #335] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2945481?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:10:30 UTC 2945481 Ms Marie Lekic [Signature #334] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2940664?utm_medium=rss Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:19:02 UTC 2940664 Mr Leslie Bridgeland [Signature #333] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2940584?utm_medium=rss Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:08:20 UTC 2940584 Mrs Tracey Butcher [Signature #332] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2939844?utm_medium=rss Leave Cookham as it is and has been for years.

]]> Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:20:44 UTC 2939844 MRS SUE WINTER [Signature #331] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2939814?utm_medium=rss Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:15:45 UTC 2939814 Mrs Claire Hodson [Signature #330] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2938769?utm_medium=rss Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:12:32 UTC 2938769 Mr Jonathan Foord [Signature #329] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2938513?utm_medium=rss I strongly object. The proposed new road is unnecessary and would be counterproductive. The narrowness and calming measures along the Pound self-regulate the traffic flow both in terms of speed and volumes. This proposal, by increasing the Pound's capacity, would cleary result in a greater volume of traffic (as by making routing via the Pound easier, traffic would be attracted from other routes) and speeds along the Pound would increase with the road being one-way only.

]]> Wed, 6 Feb 2008 04:10:13 UTC 2938513 Mrs JC White [Signature #328] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2936562?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:46:01 UTC 2936562 Mr Clive Davis [Signature #327] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2935467?utm_medium=rss I am concerned that the Plan's recommendations will damage the character of the village, lead to increased traffic and excessive housing development.

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:54:26 UTC 2935467 Mr John Harding [Signature #326] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2935299?utm_medium=rss In the Plan for Cookham much lip-service is paid to preserving the character of the three Cookhams; it is lip-service only since any pseudo-concern for our surroundings is heavily laden with caveats allowing for unbridled developments that directly invalidate this intention and which can only serve the interest of landowners, business motorists and rat-runners. What kind of fools do these planners take us for? And why was the village Design Plan not considered part of this survey's remit

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:22:48 UTC 2935299 Mr Raymond Trodd [Signature #325] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2935007?utm_medium=rss Object to the Cookham plan regarding the proposal for making The Pound one-way.

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:21:31 UTC 2935007 Susan Lee-Tanner [Signature #324] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2934322?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:58:22 UTC 2934322 Mr James Owen [Signature #323] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2934244?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:34:51 UTC 2934244 Mrs Iris Hunt [Signature #322] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2934091?utm_medium=rss I am familiar with the site. Once again, bureaucracy gone mad - jobs for the boys looking incredibly busy without actually doing anything constructively. No need for this road!
On the news today - pancake racing banned in a town in Yorkshire for health and safety reasons.
Just about sums up today's madhouse.

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:56:37 UTC 2934091 Mr Elias Kupfermann [Signature #321] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2933898?utm_medium=rss Cookham archaeologist, historian and heritage consultant - researched and worked extensively on the archaeology and history of the village. The conservation area in question dates back to at least the Saxon period.

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:44:37 UTC 2933898 Mrs Lilian Dubois [Signature #320] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2933765?utm_medium=rss The proposed gyratory system for the Poundfield area would lead to increased traffic, higher speeds and congestion in Cookham village. It would also lead to a suburban environment detrimental to this important conservation area and to Cokham as a whole. I believe that the present ramps and 20 mph limit work effectively and have slowed down traffic and improved safety for pedestrians and cyclists.

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:02:26 UTC 2933765 Ms Andrea MacLeod [Signature #319] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2933741?utm_medium=rss A one-way system will only increase traffic, not manage it.

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:52:11 UTC 2933741 Mrs Susan Douglas [Signature #318] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2933545?utm_medium=rss I regularly visit Cookham, partly for its rural peacefulness and partly because it was the long standing home of my ancestors, therefore I am very saddened to hear of this proposed traffic scheme and object to it.

I realise that schemes like these are the raison detre of traffic engineers, and they feel that with their expertise, they are doing what is best, but but it is equally important to properly listen to those most affected.

I hope the planners have the grace to let this one go

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 04:07:46 UTC 2933545 mr john barker [Signature #317] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2933510?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Feb 2008 03:51:47 UTC 2933510 Mrs Josephine Brown [Signature #316] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2933220?utm_medium=rss This will spoil a lovely rural lane and lose yet more open countryside. No doubt the plan will be to build new houses on Poundfield - something the landowner has been trying to do for years. Don't let it happen!

]]> Tue, 5 Feb 2008 01:27:21 UTC 2933220 Mrs Frances Clark [Signature #315] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2931668?utm_medium=rss As a once regular visitor to a house in the Pound, it is difficult for me to comprehend how anyone fortunate enough to live in a wonderful village like Cookham could even consider destroying the Poundfield landscape which Spencer immortalised in his Englefield paintings.
When they see these paintings, would your children and grandchildren etc. ever forgive you all for such desecration?
Think about it very carefully indeed, as we are but custodians of such precious places for our descendants.

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:46:37 UTC 2931668 Ms Louisa Knight [Signature #314] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2931526?utm_medium=rss When has there been any accident in the Pound? Careful pedestrians are now safe as traffic is slowed by humps. The narrow pavement is part of the character of the village.
Let’s keep the Pound and Poundfield intact but ban ALL heavy traffic from Cookham village.
It’s high time that Maidenhead, not Cookham, addressed the issue of Maidonians’ through traffic by building a road in North Town, Maidenhead between Cookham Road and Sutton Road. Why should Maidenhead’s needs become Cookham’s problem?

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:08:48 UTC 2931526 Ms Vivien Carrod [Signature #313] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2931507?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:04:06 UTC 2931507 mr Anonymous [Signature #312] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2931501?utm_medium=rss If this goes ahead it will generate more traffic through Cookham's old village and bridge ruining it for everyone who lives here and all those like us who love to visit the historic old village area.

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 03:02:39 UTC 2931501 Mrs Pam Knight [Signature #311] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2931426?utm_medium=rss Poundfield is in a Conservation area, the lovely backdrop to houses mostly over 150 years old, some even of medieval origin & listed. This plan is unfitting to such an area. Historically, the Pound is the western end of medieval Cookham town. 160 years ago it had baker’s, grocer’s, butcher’s & blacksmith’s shops, a beerhouse & two pubs, with orchards behind. Only fields lined the lane from Pound to Dean.
Its importance MUST be recognised. We cannot allow old Cookham to be eroded as threatened.

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 02:39:10 UTC 2931426 mr alistair eglinton [Signature #310] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2931211?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 01:35:33 UTC 2931211 Ian Sloman [Signature #309] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2931026?utm_medium=rss Should we not consider traffic lights or other alternatives to ease the traffic flow? A circular loop will increase traffic flow/speed and add to pedestrian worries. It is like saying build another bridge to ease congestion on Ferry lane. This is not a solution, it just creates more problems.

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:42:18 UTC 2931026 Mr, Gordon A. C. Lewis [Signature #308] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2930967?utm_medium=rss I lived in Cookham during WW2, It is a charming place. I went to School there.I am Apalled that anyone would be so crass as to try to change such a beautiful place. When I come to England I always go to Cookham for its charm, beauty and quietness, thank you for considering my remarks. Gordon A. C. Lewis

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:28:02 UTC 2930967 Mr Peter Prior [Signature #307] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2930945?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:22:14 UTC 2930945 Mrs Jan Weare [Signature #306] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2930905?utm_medium=rss Can't believe how the steering group arrived at this proposal, it's a scandal. If adopted it will be a disaster for Cookham. It will encourage the Pound to become an even busier rat run and create problems in the village as the increased flow backs up from the bridge.

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:11:21 UTC 2930905 Mr Nigel Harper [Signature #305] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2930854?utm_medium=rss Should this plan go ahead, it will generate more traffic through Cookham's old village and bridge, and ruin it for everyone who lives there and for all those who, like me, love to visit the historic old village area.

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:54:26 UTC 2930854 Mr Dominic Gavin [Signature #304] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2930658?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:56:26 UTC 2930658 mrs kathryn phillips [Signature #303] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2930289?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:12:28 UTC 2930289 Ms Sandra Chambers [Signature #302] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2930285?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:11:38 UTC 2930285 Mr. Martin Holes [Signature #301] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2929940?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:37:50 UTC 2929940 mrs aleks brown [Signature #300] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2929921?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:33:46 UTC 2929921 mr Paul Trice [Signature #299] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2929846?utm_medium=rss This development would destroythe very special nature of our village. There is no need for these changes it would just cause further problems in the furture instead of helping traffic flow it would increase it.

There is to little open green spaces, do not destroy what lttle we have.

THE RECENT FLOODS HAVE INDICATED THE NEED FOR OPEN GREEN SPACES, IF WE MADE THESE CAHNGES MORE PROPERTIES AND BUSINESSES WOULD BE PRONE TO POTENTIAL FLLODING

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:10:30 UTC 2929846 Mr M Crosby [Signature #298] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2929745?utm_medium=rss Why turn a pleaseant village in yet another car focused ring road that takes no account of the lives of the people who live there, just the cars that drive though it.

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:31:19 UTC 2929745 Mr Dave Cosgrave [Signature #297] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2929730?utm_medium=rss Whilst the traffic is a problem at the Pound area, this would be better resolved by traffic lights which would only allow vehicles to travel one way at a time through the narrow parts and allow the pathway to be widened. A new road is completely over the top and would increase through traffic and traffic speeds leading to greater chances of accidents.

]]> Mon, 4 Feb 2008 06:26:13 UTC 2929730 Ms Laura Vohryzek [Signature #296] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2929658?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:56:00 UTC 2929658 Mr John Darvell [Signature #295] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2929576?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:14:40 UTC 2929576 Guy Wootten [Signature #294] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2927562?utm_medium=rss No new road is required or needed in this beautiful village. Stop this plan!

]]> Sun, 3 Feb 2008 04:10:46 UTC 2927562 Mrs Shallu Behar-Sheehan [Signature #293] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2927552?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Feb 2008 04:07:37 UTC 2927552 Mr Jeremy Sheehan [Signature #292] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2927542?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Feb 2008 04:05:25 UTC 2927542 Mrs Dawn Wootten [Signature #291] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2927512?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Feb 2008 03:55:47 UTC 2927512 Raymond Reed [Signature #290] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2927479?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Feb 2008 03:45:19 UTC 2927479 Mr Gary Milner [Signature #289] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2927185?utm_medium=rss I believe that this project will ultimately encourage further traffic & clearly lower the quality of life for the local residents

]]> Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:46:48 UTC 2927185 Mrs Carol Milner [Signature #288] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2927179?utm_medium=rss I oppose the proposed road plan - as I believe that this will encourage more through traffic, create more polution (harm the enviroment & nearby conservation site) & will place enormous pressure on the local infrasturucture.
Also, I believe that this could lead to further building projects.

]]> Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:44:43 UTC 2927179 Mrs Diana Brealey [Signature #287] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/2927072?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:12:54 UTC 2927072