http://www.gopetition.com/signatures/say-no-to-danbank.html Online petition signatures en-us Sat, 25 Apr 2026 02:10 UTC GoPetition RSS Feed Generator Copyright 2026 GoPetition https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16386342?utm_medium=rss Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:29:17 UTC 16386342 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16381199?utm_medium=rss Mon, 9 Dec 2013 03:22:17 UTC 16381199 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16377701?utm_medium=rss I don't think the development on Greenfield should go ahead. This will over shadow already busy housing area. This will increase move traffic through the small village and in turn will cause more accidents and problems in the town

]]> Mon, 9 Dec 2013 04:53:58 UTC 16377701 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16357273?utm_medium=rss Thu, 5 Dec 2013 03:19:40 UTC 16357273 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16349582?utm_medium=rss Tue, 3 Dec 2013 04:13:17 UTC 16349582 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16332504?utm_medium=rss Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:40:37 UTC 16332504 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16332006?utm_medium=rss This application is in direct conflict with SAMDev proposals for this land. It would increase traffic along Adderley Road & create problems for traffic exiting Hampton Drive.

]]> Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:35:54 UTC 16332006 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16329526?utm_medium=rss Fri, 29 Nov 2013 04:49:06 UTC 16329526 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16328760?utm_medium=rss THE SAM DEV PLAN COST THOUSANDS OF POUNDS AND MANY HOURS OF DISCUSSION AND CONSULTATION. HOWEVER IT NOW SEEMS IT CAN BE CHANGED AT THE DROP OF A HAT BECAUSE A DEVELOPER WANTS TO MAKE MORE MONEY FROM THEIR LAND.

]]> Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:41:10 UTC 16328760 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16327465?utm_medium=rss Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:10:36 UTC 16327465 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16326757?utm_medium=rss Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:07:37 UTC 16326757 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16323883?utm_medium=rss This is a bad idea and as a resident will produce an increase in traffic in what is a residential area. Completely unnecessary use of the site which is just for the commercial gain of the developer who clearly has no real regard for the requirements of the town. Vicon site is ready to go - give it Sainsburys and stick it to these greedy bunch!

]]> Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:52:42 UTC 16323883 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16323503?utm_medium=rss Thu, 28 Nov 2013 07:09:50 UTC 16323503 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319620?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:25:12 UTC 16319620 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319609?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:22:09 UTC 16319609 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319541?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:02:13 UTC 16319541 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319533?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:01:26 UTC 16319533 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319434?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:37:22 UTC 16319434 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319424?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:35:15 UTC 16319424 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319421?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:34:01 UTC 16319421 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319369?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:20:07 UTC 16319369 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319261?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:47:22 UTC 16319261 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16319117?utm_medium=rss As a past resident of Hampton Drive this area should remain a quiet residential area for the use of residents and for the sports facilities that are provided in Green fields Lane. To go ahead with development would encrouch on green field sites to the detriment of the town. A commercial development of this area would also have an adverse effect on the businesses in the town centre.

]]> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:08:20 UTC 16319117 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318872?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:52:02 UTC 16318872 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318794?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:28:39 UTC 16318794 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318707?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:04:12 UTC 16318707 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318672?utm_medium=rss Danbank development would be totally out of character, and not what we want

]]> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:54:46 UTC 16318672 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318635?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:45:09 UTC 16318635 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318548?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:19:57 UTC 16318548 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318341?utm_medium=rss Due to their unprofessional conduct and town damaging plans.

]]> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:15:58 UTC 16318341 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318313?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:08:19 UTC 16318313 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318281?utm_medium=rss I do not agree to this, full stop!!

]]> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:00:00 UTC 16318281 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318226?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:44:30 UTC 16318226 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318156?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 05:26:25 UTC 16318156 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318056?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:58:14 UTC 16318056 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16318016?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:49:38 UTC 16318016 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317892?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:10:02 UTC 16317892 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317880?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:05:44 UTC 16317880 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317784?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:37:39 UTC 16317784 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317735?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:23:36 UTC 16317735 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317699?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 03:13:55 UTC 16317699 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317585?utm_medium=rss We do not need any more supermarkets here least of all in this location wherre it will cause traffic chaos,misery and pollution.

]]> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:47:19 UTC 16317585 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317563?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:40:53 UTC 16317563 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317498?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:20:11 UTC 16317498 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317368?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 01:36:46 UTC 16317368 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317250?utm_medium=rss While Danbank continue to play games, submitting plans and them amending them constantly, the people of Market Drayton are deprived of a much needed Sainsburys store and the jobs this will create. Come on SCC planning. Get a grip!!

]]> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:50:05 UTC 16317250 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317232?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:44:42 UTC 16317232 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317228?utm_medium=rss Greenfields is part of the SAMDev plan for housing. Build the Sainsburys supermarket now. Market Drayton needs the jobs this will create urgently.

]]> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:42:16 UTC 16317228 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16317157?utm_medium=rss Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:02:28 UTC 16317157 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16316910?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:47:57 UTC 16316910 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16316792?utm_medium=rss The area where the supermarket is proposed is residential/sports area the position of island and petrol station is dangerous.The families on the estate who walk their children to school would be open to more traffic and accident rate would increase drastically.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:52:58 UTC 16316792 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16316538?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:18:48 UTC 16316538 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16316245?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:49:34 UTC 16316245 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16316181?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:36:33 UTC 16316181 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16316052?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:04:51 UTC 16316052 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16316013?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 04:55:39 UTC 16316013 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16315840?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 04:19:12 UTC 16315840 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16315033?utm_medium=rss Credibility of developer in terms of delivery of the project questionable. Breaches local plan putting retail premises in an allocated residential zone. Would cause considerable traffic disruption during construction and afterwards wth new preference routes creating havoc in local area.
Fuel station at back of residential area would put local dealer out of business in addition to creating noise at least 16hours a day. Retail
Premises would require restocking during early am , creating noise as lorries arrive, reversing warnings soun and unloading takes place. Sound carries more in the dead of night. There would be a considerable fiscal impact on house prices in the locality.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:49:00 UTC 16315033 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16314498?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:11:14 UTC 16314498 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16314187?utm_medium=rss There are other areas of Market Drayton which are more appropriate and will not disturbe the elderly residents of Marley Mount Crescent. Furthermore building Sainabury's at Danbank will impact the value of the homes in the surrounding area.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:14:07 UTC 16314187 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16313916?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:27:29 UTC 16313916 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16313675?utm_medium=rss Why when I wish to object to something that seems to be going forever and a day do I only get 14 days to reply, but danbank can continue to change their efforts on a daily basis, I thought the Market drayton town council had already said ok to sainsbury over a year ago or as near as dammit. why do danbank think they can change everything to suit everyone. Hopefully they will soon learn we will continue to object to their plans and demonstrate our feelings in an appriopriate manner until the matter is resolved, so can Shrewsbury Planning committee please tell us when the planning meeting is going to be and not keep deferring the matter, as I am considering to speak with solicitors regarding this matter.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:40:05 UTC 16313675 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16313672?utm_medium=rss Why when I wish to object to something that seems to be going forever and a day do I only get 14 days to reply, but danbank can continue to change their efforts on a daily basis, I thought the Market drayton town council had already said ok to sainsbury over a year ago or as near as dammit. why do danbank think they can change everything to suit everyone. Hopefully they will soon learn we will continue to object to their plans and demonstrate our feelings in an appriopriate manner until the matter is resolved, so can Shrewsbury Planning committee please tell us when the planning meeting is going to be and not keep deferring the matter, as I am considering to speak with solicitors regarding this matter.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:39:24 UTC 16313672 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16313665?utm_medium=rss Why when I wish to object to something that seems to be going forever and a day do I only get 14 days to reply, but danbank can continue to change their efforts on a daily basis, I thought the Market drayton town council had already said ok to sainsbury over a year ago or as near as dammit. why do danbank think they can change everything to suit everyone. Hopefully they will soon learn we will continue to object to their plans and demonstrate our feelings in an appriopriate manner until the matter is resolved, so can Shrewsbury Planning committee please tell us when the planning meeting is going to be and not keep deferring the matter, as I am considering to speak with solicitors regarding this matter.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:38:25 UTC 16313665 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16313612?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:29:44 UTC 16313612 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16313513?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:08:08 UTC 16313513 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16313001?utm_medium=rss How this proposal has been allowed to progress this far totally baffles me. Can I suggest that Shropshire council take control of this situation before the inspectorate is called in to manage the situation.
The proposal is totally against the SAM Dev proposals for this area. If this proposal gets the go ahead it will call into question all planning in Shropshire.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:30:29 UTC 16313001 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16312983?utm_medium=rss This town needs more houses for first time buyers, and more to rent from housing associations. There eough large stores in the local area. more development is needed in the town centre, With another petrol station, will fuel be cheaper for the motorist????. Sports field development yes, along side the housing. I believe a number of the devopment will be 4-5 bed houses with only a very few for the cheaper market.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:27:48 UTC 16312983 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16312928?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 07:18:55 UTC 16312928 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16312669?utm_medium=rss The town desperately needs housing.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 06:28:32 UTC 16312669 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16312517?utm_medium=rss NO!
I have written twice to object on the council website - how many more times to we have to say NO - will anyone take any notice?

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 06:04:15 UTC 16312517 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16312150?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:13:11 UTC 16312150 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16312081?utm_medium=rss Sainsbury's planning was agreed by yourselves before Danebank came on the scene. They saw an opportunity to make a few 'bucks'. As a result they have tried every tactic to get planning and I can see Sainsburys not proceeding if this continues. A second supermarket (Sainsbury's) in town would be good but a third would not be viable. Why is the council still considering Danebank's proposal as there is so much opposition? and little logic to their idea.

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 05:03:21 UTC 16312081 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16312029?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 04:58:22 UTC 16312029 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16311530?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 03:41:27 UTC 16311530 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16311444?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 03:28:41 UTC 16311444 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16311413?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 03:23:30 UTC 16311413 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16311170?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:39:12 UTC 16311170 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16311098?utm_medium=rss More affordable housing is needed on this site

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:25:31 UTC 16311098 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16311075?utm_medium=rss More affordable housing is needed on this site

]]> Tue, 26 Nov 2013 02:21:05 UTC 16311075 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16310904?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:50:10 UTC 16310904 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16310754?utm_medium=rss Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:23:32 UTC 16310754 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16308621?utm_medium=rss do strongly object to the scheme that Danbank are trying to force into an area that has been earmarked for residential development and has been implemented on the SANDAV PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE

]]> Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:46:01 UTC 16308621 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16308071?utm_medium=rss This land was scheduled for housing and not commercial development. The roads in this area are not capable of handling heavy traffic.

]]> Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:00:55 UTC 16308071 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16306117?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 05:13:05 UTC 16306117 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16306071?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 05:02:36 UTC 16306071 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16306051?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:59:54 UTC 16306051 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16306042?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:57:29 UTC 16306042 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16306041?utm_medium=rss This land should be left for housing,the access is far to dangerous for the amount of traffic flow a supermarket would bring. Too many children use this area to access the Greenfields sports fields. It's an accident waiting to happen if this goes ahead as a supermarket

]]> Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:56:57 UTC 16306041 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16306024?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:54:05 UTC 16306024 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16306008?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:50:56 UTC 16306008 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305993?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:46:58 UTC 16305993 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305960?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:39:12 UTC 16305960 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305936?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:34:07 UTC 16305936 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305918?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:31:45 UTC 16305918 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305908?utm_medium=rss Mon, 25 Nov 2013 04:28:30 UTC 16305908 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305687?utm_medium=rss External traffic should be kept out of residenmtial areas, otherwise they are not safe for our children!

]]> Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:50:10 UTC 16305687 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305540?utm_medium=rss I am against the Danbank development as I think it will cause extra traffic on an already busy estate. Children safety playing outside houses will be affected. Lighting and noise from a 24 hour operation close to houses that when I purchase my home knew the field would be built on at some point, as the area does need to grow but not used for commerical business that from the plans does not shield or take into consideration existing homes leading off greenfield lane.

]]> Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:25:28 UTC 16305540 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305446?utm_medium=rss My children play football at greenfields and from a safety point of view greenfields lane would be very dangerous if this proposal of a supermarket is placed I strongly object to the danbank proposal.

]]> Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:08:43 UTC 16305446 https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/16305393?utm_medium=rss Let's get on with Sainsburys, and kick these money grabbers in the teeth.

]]> Mon, 25 Nov 2013 02:59:26 UTC 16305393