Elaine Fujimura [Signature #61]</h1> <article> <h1>Elaine Fujimura [Signature #61]</h1> <p>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 07:25:12 UTC</p> Elaine Fujimura, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Frank Phillips [Signature #60]</h1> <p>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:35:42 UTC</p> Frank Phillips, Columbus, Ohio<p>Too many rental units for such a small area. Plan does not provide for adequate parking, landscaping, or other infrastructure.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Marianne Macke [Signature #59]</h1> <p>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:41:03 UTC</p> Marianne Macke, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Susan Otten [Signature #58]</h1> <p>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:53:23 UTC</p> Susan Otten, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #57]</h1> <p>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:32:06 UTC</p> Anonymous, columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Clayton Lowe [Signature #56]</h1> <p>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 11:16:19 UTC</p> Clayton Lowe, Columbus, Ohio<p>Exit from E. California to High Street is extremely dangerous now because of heavy parking on High Street and heavy traffic into McDonalds. E. Calfornia is also very narrow with parking on both sides and very difficult for city service vehicles to get up the street. And, finally, the steep grade up E. California is almost impassable in the winter because the street is rarely plowed before the surface turns to ice. The additional density of this development will turn our street into a nightmare</p> </article> <article> <h1>Estelle Silbermann [Signature #55]</h1> <p>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:28:06 UTC</p> Estelle Silbermann, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Tim Chavez [Signature #54]</h1> <p>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:10:20 UTC</p> Tim Chavez, Columbus, ohio<p>This variance will impact negatively on the residential neighborhood.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Richard Fowler [Signature #53]</h1> <p>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:25:59 UTC</p> Richard Fowler, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #52]</h1> <p>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:50:23 UTC</p> Anonymous, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Laurence Gilbert [Signature #51]</h1> <p>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:33:01 UTC</p> Laurence Gilbert, Columbus, OH<p>Projects that are simply cash cows for a developer and cause significant damage to the community are unacceptable. This developer does no service to either the community or the residents of the proposed building by having no provisions to accomodate 100% off street parking for the projected residential load. California Street is a narrow road already overcrowded with parking from the houses it serves. No development should be allowed without minimal impact to the existing environment.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Simone Morgen [Signature #50]</h1> <p>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:18:25 UTC</p> Simone Morgen, Columbus, OH<p>Clintonville residents should have some control over their neighborhood.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mary Nowels [Signature #49]</h1> <p>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:10:31 UTC</p> Mary Nowels, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Jodi Kushins [Signature #48]</h1> <p>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:08:46 UTC</p> Jodi Kushins, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Susan Fabro [Signature #47]</h1> <p>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:57:11 UTC</p> Susan Fabro, Columbus, ohio </article> <article> <h1>Richard Rhodes [Signature #46]</h1> <p>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:53:50 UTC</p> Richard Rhodes, Columbus, Ohio<p>Parking is already a problem on Pacemont,<br /> especially in the winter when there is snow.<br /> This development will make the problem<br /> much worse.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Stephen Scott [Signature #45]</h1> <p>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:48:38 UTC</p> Stephen Scott, Columbus, Ohio<p>We own 125 East Pacemont and lived there<br /> for fifteen years.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Micaela Stratton [Signature #44]</h1> <p>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:44:04 UTC</p> Micaela Stratton, Columbus, Ohio<p>We own 125 East Pacemont and lived there<br /> for fifteen years.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Susan Au Arnold [Signature #43]</h1> <p>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:01:38 UTC</p> Susan Au Arnold, Columbus, Franklin<p>Too much building for too little space--why add the extra area facing onto E California. Use of the alleys for exits is a horrible and dangerous idea</p> </article> <article> <h1>Ann Woods [Signature #42]</h1> <p>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:25:35 UTC</p> Ann Woods, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Rhonda Walklup [Signature #41]</h1> <p>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:13:44 UTC</p> Rhonda Walklup, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>rick adams [Signature #40]</h1> <p>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:43:54 UTC</p> rick adams, Columbus, OH<p>I oppose the proposed variance for mixed-use development at the corner of E. California and High. Reducing the number and size of required parking spaces,and exempting the parking lot screening and green space requirements is short-sighted and, if granted, will be to the detriment of the character of our neigborhood.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #39]</h1> <p>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:29:53 UTC</p> Anonymous, Columbus, OH<p>I see no reason to exclude green space requirements at the detriment of the neighboring streets and overall community. We want an architectural / zoning integrity to the whole community.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Catherine Hunziker [Signature #38]</h1> <p>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:50:36 UTC</p> Catherine Hunziker, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Jack Howarth [Signature #37]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:39:00 UTC</p> Jack Howarth, Columbus, OH<p>This would be overbuilding.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Joyce Schatz [Signature #36]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:52:42 UTC</p> Joyce Schatz, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Peter Coccia [Signature #35]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:14:51 UTC</p> Peter Coccia, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Kevin Coyne [Signature #34]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:42:14 UTC</p> Kevin Coyne, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Barry Workman [Signature #33]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:49:23 UTC</p> Barry Workman, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Anthony Paragon [Signature #32]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:45:10 UTC</p> Anthony Paragon, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Julia Pierpont [Signature #31]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:39 UTC</p> Julia Pierpont, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Donna Siple [Signature #30]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:05:48 UTC</p> Donna Siple, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>mark wherry [Signature #29]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:32:03 UTC</p> mark wherry, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>michael tomko [Signature #28]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:30:56 UTC</p> michael tomko, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>carole tomko [Signature #27]</h1> <p>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:28:38 UTC</p> carole tomko, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Warren Clark [Signature #26]</h1> <p>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:10:28 UTC</p> Warren Clark, Columbus, OH<p>This project does not appear to enhance Clintonville's future as a desirable place to live, work, and visit. Suspending zoning provisions designed to assure that development is attractive and beneficial for the community as well as the developer presents more minuses than pluses to those who live and pay taxes here already.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Marilyn Clark [Signature #25]</h1> <p>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:56:22 UTC</p> Marilyn Clark, Columbus, OH<p>The importance of protecting and improving the quality of life in Clintonville's existing residential neighborhoods should be paramount. The proposed development and variance requests would encourage more people to live in smaller spaces, add more cars without adequate parking, and create yet more retail space to compete with currently unfilled retail space. It is inconsistent with Clintonville's historic, environmental, safety, and aesthetic interests.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Mary Rauschenberg [Signature #24]</h1> <p>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:21:44 UTC</p> Mary Rauschenberg, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #23]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:30:48 UTC</p> Anonymous, Columbus, OH<p>I am not opposed to development on this property, just to this specific proposal and the numerous variances that are requested. I would be supportive of a plan that adequately addresses the concerns stated here.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Chip Moore [Signature #22]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:38:07 UTC</p> Chip Moore, Clintonville, oh<p>Please respect the character of this neighborhood. No one is against well planned and thoughtful development.</p> </article> <article> <h1>karen wander [Signature #21]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:22:01 UTC</p> karen wander, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Ann Wilson [Signature #20]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:54:24 UTC</p> Ann Wilson, Columbus, Oh </article> <article> <h1>Mike Whited [Signature #19]</h1> <p>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:54:17 UTC</p> Mike Whited, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Barbara Rigney [Signature #18]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:38:15 UTC</p> Barbara Rigney, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Kimble Rigney [Signature #17]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:36:16 UTC</p> Kimble Rigney, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Joseph Gerwin [Signature #16]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:15:12 UTC</p> Joseph Gerwin, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Thomas Hixon [Signature #15]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:08:04 UTC</p> Thomas Hixon, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Suzanne Rizer [Signature #14]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:59:04 UTC</p> Suzanne Rizer, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>laura hardie [Signature #13]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:40:55 UTC</p> laura hardie, columbus, ohio </article> <article> <h1>Cynthia Colucy [Signature #12]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:29:41 UTC</p> Cynthia Colucy, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Martha M Miller [Signature #11]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:25:40 UTC</p> Martha M Miller, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Anonymous [Signature #10]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 03:03:48 UTC</p> Anonymous, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Dennis Pusateri [Signature #9]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:20:17 UTC</p> Dennis Pusateri, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>E Hoard [Signature #8]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:41:57 UTC</p> E Hoard, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Darlene Kura [Signature #7]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:40:51 UTC</p> Darlene Kura, Columbus, OH </article> <article> <h1>Michael J. West [Signature #6]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:49:12 UTC</p> Michael J. West, Columbus, OH<p>Inappropriate development for the property</p> </article> <article> <h1>Alan Woods [Signature #5]</h1> <p>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:59:49 UTC</p> Alan Woods, Columbus, Ohio </article> <article> <h1>Nancy McDonald-Kenworthy [Signature #4]</h1> <p>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:23:57 UTC</p> Nancy McDonald-Kenworthy, Columbus, OH<p>THIS NEIGHBORHOOD HAS TOO LITTLE SPACE FOR THIS MUCH HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, UNLESS THERE WOULD BE A 3 OR 4 STORY UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE. OTHEWISE, THE QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD SURROUNDING THIS CORNER CANNOT HANDLE ALL THIS MUCH ETA PARKING! IT IS ALREADY DENSE, AND ROOM FOR ONLY ONE CAR WHEN BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET ARE PARKED, WHICH, BY THE WAY, ARE ALREADY FILLED BY THE OWNERS OF THE HOUSES ALREADY EXISTING ON THE EDGES BOTH NORTH AND SOUTH OF THIS TINY STREET. PLEASE STOP THIS PROPOSAL.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Gary Means [Signature #3]</h1> <p>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:03:20 UTC</p> Gary Means, Columbus, OH<p>Listen to the neighborhood.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Jane Hoffelt [Signature #2]</h1> <p>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:00:34 UTC</p> Jane Hoffelt, Columbus, OH<p>Development should enhance Clintonville's unique character, not work against it.</p> </article> <article> <h1>Suzanne Heckman [Signature #1]</h1> <p>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:14:43 UTC</p> Suzanne Heckman, Columbus, Ohio </article> </main></body></html>