Oppose the Cuba Street Towers Petition: Signature List Feed http://www.gopetition.com/signatures/oppose-the-cuba-street-towers.html Online petition signatures en-us Sat, 4 Apr 2026 02:40 UTC GoPetition RSS Feed Generator Copyright 2026 GoPetition kathrine lloyd jones [Signature #168] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/19415572?utm_medium=rss Owner of flat 28:10 Landmark West Tower, 22 Marsh Wall

]]> Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:01:29 UTC 19415572 Ralph Vixama [Signature #167] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/19223785?utm_medium=rss Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:29:17 UTC 19223785 Noshad Islam [Signature #166] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/17782054?utm_medium=rss Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:47:41 UTC 17782054 Ying Guo [Signature #165] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/15548063?utm_medium=rss Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:42:42 UTC 15548063 Gerard Terblanche [Signature #164] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/15467135?utm_medium=rss Area already too dense and the loss of light for neighbouring blocks will be disastrous.

]]> Mon, 1 Jul 2013 05:14:25 UTC 15467135 martin glover [Signature #163] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/14519496?utm_medium=rss Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:22:02 UTC 14519496 kat glover [Signature #162] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/14519492?utm_medium=rss Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:21:23 UTC 14519492 Anonymous [Signature #161] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/14322499?utm_medium=rss Un-appropriate plan for the wrong location. The towers are too great for the small plot of land! The existing amenities and roads are already so cramped!. The reduction in natural light for the owners/tenants in close proximity would be unacceptable!

]]> Thu, 3 Jan 2013 05:38:05 UTC 14322499 Anonymous [Signature #160] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/13240608?utm_medium=rss An unacceptable loss of light and degradation of living conditions both during and following construction. This tower should not be allowed to proceed.

]]> Wed, 4 Jul 2012 06:52:03 UTC 13240608 paul esslemont [Signature #159] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/12904136?utm_medium=rss Thu, 24 May 2012 12:41:46 UTC 12904136 Michelle Ray [Signature #158] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/12689357?utm_medium=rss Sat, 5 May 2012 02:18:35 UTC 12689357 Richard Whiteley [Signature #157] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/12689321?utm_medium=rss Sat, 5 May 2012 02:09:58 UTC 12689321 Jan Whiteley [Signature #156] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/12675106?utm_medium=rss This proposed development is totally wrong for the area. The height of the towers is too great for the small plot of land on which they would be built. There would be severe pressure put on the existing amenities and roads. The reduction in natural light for the owners/tenants in close proximity would be unacceptable.

]]> Thu, 3 May 2012 02:12:22 UTC 12675106 Anonymous [Signature #155] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/12669366?utm_medium=rss The towers are too big and i fear the area density compared to its size will not be appropriate. A smaller building would be more suitable.

]]> Wed, 2 May 2012 06:27:01 UTC 12669366 Yeong Shin Gan [Signature #154] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/11069729?utm_medium=rss Sat, 27 Aug 2011 12:47:02 UTC 11069729 Katerina Bursikova [Signature #153] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10972257?utm_medium=rss The Isle of Dogs is already crowded. Local roads, transport and service capacity is already stretched. This would mean huge negative impact for the current residents and decrease value of their properties. There will be light and space obstruction. I strongly disagree with this planning application.

]]> Tue, 9 Aug 2011 01:04:07 UTC 10972257 Tian Lim [Signature #152] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10971849?utm_medium=rss Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:08:39 UTC 10971849 Stuart K Bellehewe [Signature #151] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10966585?utm_medium=rss Local (voting) residents coming second to Developers who build and run?

]]> Mon, 8 Aug 2011 04:39:09 UTC 10966585 Poh Leng Tang [Signature #150] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10959798?utm_medium=rss Such a tall building on the tiny plot of land would make the building far too close to the other buildings around, causing overshadows. Construction noise and pollution would also have serious impact on nearby residents.

]]> Sat, 6 Aug 2011 03:35:30 UTC 10959798 Jamees Lui [Signature #149] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10951661?utm_medium=rss This area is too small and cramped for such a big project

]]> Thu, 4 Aug 2011 03:12:02 UTC 10951661 Claire Bradley [Signature #148] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10949802?utm_medium=rss Thu, 4 Aug 2011 05:21:10 UTC 10949802 Anonymous [Signature #147] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10940533?utm_medium=rss Tue, 2 Aug 2011 06:38:32 UTC 10940533 richard wallis [Signature #146] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10931190?utm_medium=rss congestion busy West Ferry Rd

Density population too high in a restricted area

Loss of light block far too high

]]> Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:40:35 UTC 10931190 Anonymous [Signature #145] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10929563?utm_medium=rss Sat, 30 Jul 2011 02:17:54 UTC 10929563 Anonymous [Signature #144] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10928484?utm_medium=rss This household objects to the Cuba Street development on the basis of its excessive size and scale and negative impact and strain most lively to local amenities, transport and resources.

]]> Sat, 30 Jul 2011 05:03:44 UTC 10928484 Anonymous [Signature #143] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10928228?utm_medium=rss Sat, 30 Jul 2011 02:45:52 UTC 10928228 Anonymous [Signature #142] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10928223?utm_medium=rss Sat, 30 Jul 2011 02:43:30 UTC 10928223 Pablo USON [Signature #141] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10927473?utm_medium=rss Fri, 29 Jul 2011 06:41:18 UTC 10927473 Hui Li [Signature #140] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10927169?utm_medium=rss Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:02:19 UTC 10927169 Zijun Liu [Signature #139] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10927162?utm_medium=rss Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:00:41 UTC 10927162 Brenda Pascal [Signature #138] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10927001?utm_medium=rss This part of the Isle of Dogs is already congested by buildings. Environmentally unsound! Put people first.

]]> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:24:13 UTC 10927001 Venera collishe [Signature #137] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10926412?utm_medium=rss Extra council tax collected from the development in the future will not balance your sheets. Where will the council build playgrounds? Parking? Social community centres? Create school spaces for new residents? Widen roads? Some urban designers you are - pathetic....

]]> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 02:03:24 UTC 10926412 Kim Carr [Signature #136] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10926214?utm_medium=rss You are over populating our Island

]]> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:15:48 UTC 10926214 Rachael Crellin [Signature #135] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10925573?utm_medium=rss Who benefits from this development exactly?

]]> Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:35:10 UTC 10925573 Sarah Burrell [Signature #134] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10921663?utm_medium=rss Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:30:10 UTC 10921663 Alice Wong [Signature #133] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10905406?utm_medium=rss Object to the building of Cuba Street Towers

]]> Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:54:49 UTC 10905406 Anonymous [Signature #132] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10893500?utm_medium=rss Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:28:19 UTC 10893500 Anonymous [Signature #131] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10870368?utm_medium=rss Mon, 18 Jul 2011 08:07:37 UTC 10870368 Anonymous [Signature #130] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10867978?utm_medium=rss I strongly object to the planning application PA/11/01299 which is against to a series of official planning regulations , guidelines and policies and does not respect the overall sustainability and local residents' quality of life in this area.

]]> Sun, 17 Jul 2011 08:15:09 UTC 10867978 Sara Kirdar [Signature #129] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10867592?utm_medium=rss Sun, 17 Jul 2011 05:31:34 UTC 10867592 Arun Raghavan [Signature #128] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10867361?utm_medium=rss Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:26:38 UTC 10867361 Kyara Mathias [Signature #127] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10867351?utm_medium=rss Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:23:29 UTC 10867351 Yee mei Mui [Signature #126] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10864387?utm_medium=rss Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:10:08 UTC 10864387 LEO ZHAO [Signature #125] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10862998?utm_medium=rss Please do not block our view& give us a quite living envirment!

]]> Sat, 16 Jul 2011 05:57:16 UTC 10862998 NOAH OWUSU [Signature #124] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10861858?utm_medium=rss I OBJECT TO THE PLANS BECAUSE OF :
1)LOSS OF NATURAL LIGHT-DAYLIGHT/ SUNLIGHT
2)LOSS OF PRIVACY
3)ADD TO CONGESTION
4)LOSS OF PARKING SPACES
5)LOSS OF GREEN SPACE

]]> Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:56:32 UTC 10861858 Nicky Maan [Signature #123] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10861727?utm_medium=rss Too much congestion for the area. Blocking of views of the landmark.

]]> Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:08:26 UTC 10861727 David Wood [Signature #122] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10861044?utm_medium=rss Sat, 16 Jul 2011 06:18:26 UTC 10861044 Tat Wai Cheung [Signature #121] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10860647?utm_medium=rss Sat, 16 Jul 2011 03:27:20 UTC 10860647 Anonymous [Signature #120] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10859250?utm_medium=rss objection to the application NO:PA/11/01299, creating noise pollution, violating personal space, blocking natural light.

]]> Fri, 15 Jul 2011 05:26:52 UTC 10859250 F Shoughi [Signature #119] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10858657?utm_medium=rss Fri, 15 Jul 2011 02:04:20 UTC 10858657 Anonymous [Signature #118] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10849975?utm_medium=rss Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:22:48 UTC 10849975 Anonymous [Signature #117] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10845007?utm_medium=rss Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:47:45 UTC 10845007 Cheok Hui lan [Signature #116] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10840717?utm_medium=rss The new development will add to the congestion and further strain local resources . There is no corresponding increase in the local services available to support the huge amount of expected increase in popularion.

]]> Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:24:20 UTC 10840717 Anonymous [Signature #115] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10840029?utm_medium=rss Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:17:35 UTC 10840029 karin lau [Signature #114] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10840014?utm_medium=rss Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:14:14 UTC 10840014 Anonymous [Signature #113] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10839597?utm_medium=rss Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:38:21 UTC 10839597 Rui Almeida [Signature #112] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10839392?utm_medium=rss Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:55:32 UTC 10839392 Vanessa Chua [Signature #111] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10838816?utm_medium=rss Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:07:28 UTC 10838816 Anonymous [Signature #110] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10837687?utm_medium=rss These two skyscrapers may create some permanent problems for the area.

]]> Mon, 11 Jul 2011 07:01:03 UTC 10837687 See Khiang Koh [Signature #109] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10836091?utm_medium=rss Sun, 10 Jul 2011 09:44:11 UTC 10836091 Nick Silversides [Signature #108] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10835326?utm_medium=rss The housing density is 3 times the planing guidelines for that part of the Island, this fact alone should mean these towers should not be built.

These high density building will place a strain on local resources and facilities, like the nearby GP practice.

Increased traffic and noise pollution for the area.

]]> Sun, 10 Jul 2011 05:39:10 UTC 10835326 Anonymous [Signature #107] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10834460?utm_medium=rss Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:55:17 UTC 10834460 Andy Lucas [Signature #106] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10834222?utm_medium=rss Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:16:51 UTC 10834222 Naoual Bennaçar [Signature #105] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10834063?utm_medium=rss Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:58:15 UTC 10834063 James McEwan [Signature #104] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10833897?utm_medium=rss There is insufficient infrastructure to support another large building (medical, transport, facilities, recreation) - in addition to the impact on right to light of existing residents.

]]> Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:34:09 UTC 10833897 Esbjorn Redmo [Signature #103] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10832827?utm_medium=rss The building is not right for the area, which is already strained infrastructurally. Wholeheartedly agree with http://www.cubastreet.org.uk.

]]> Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:18:28 UTC 10832827 Cecilia Rittsjo [Signature #102] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10832746?utm_medium=rss Agree with reasons given on www.cubastreet.org.uk. There are already problem with traffic in the area. (Buses won´t be able to naviagte corners around the plot and the number of cabs related to a hotel would cause problems.) It is already a problem getting a booking at local NHS, the Barkantine, local buses are crowded, the area will have a lot less daylight. A construction of this type should be nearer the commercial district of Canary Wharf.

]]> Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:12:18 UTC 10832746 M L [Signature #101] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10831946?utm_medium=rss The proposed development should be opposed for the following reasons:
(1) denial of the legal right to light for the neighbouring buildings which are low rise as a result of the development.
(2) strain on already overwhelmed roads and essential services eg doctors and also limited transport in and out of the wharf. At peak hours it is already difficult to get on the DLR and tube services.
(3) against LBTH policy of reducing building height levels the further the building is from the wharf.

]]> Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:40:22 UTC 10831946 Anonymous [Signature #100] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10831926?utm_medium=rss The development is too large to be built on the small plot of land, not to mention that the access roads are too small to support the increase of vehicular access during and after the build.

]]> Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:29:49 UTC 10831926 Paul Esslemont [Signature #99] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10831251?utm_medium=rss Many reason for not having such buildings here. the area is too small. Population density is already high. Many families with small children live in direct sight of these proposed constructions. Noise, lack of light, parking restrictions, doctors. This will be a strain on both people and resources once it is completed.

]]> Sun, 10 Jul 2011 04:31:22 UTC 10831251 Alistair Good [Signature #98] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10828867?utm_medium=rss Sat, 9 Jul 2011 03:12:58 UTC 10828867 Louise Good [Signature #97] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10828757?utm_medium=rss Sat, 9 Jul 2011 02:43:28 UTC 10828757 Anonymous [Signature #96] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10828551?utm_medium=rss I object to this planning application as the site is way too small for such high-rise buildings. The towers, if built, are going to almost completely block the natural lights of the south-facing flats, meaning there will be massive deterioration of living conditions for those residents. And the fact that only 7 residents handed in objections in Feburary does not mean people who didn't do that then are in favour of or neutral to this planning application. Silence is not equivalent to consent.

]]> Sat, 9 Jul 2011 01:57:55 UTC 10828551 Harry Li [Signature #95] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10823365?utm_medium=rss Site is inappropriate for such a large development.

]]> Fri, 8 Jul 2011 09:34:19 UTC 10823365 Anonymous [Signature #94] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10822860?utm_medium=rss Fri, 8 Jul 2011 06:54:32 UTC 10822860 Anonymous [Signature #93] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10819763?utm_medium=rss this area is too small to build these sky scrapers and allowing these buildings to be built will affect residents privacy as it will be so close to manilla street flats. Parking is allready limited and a big issue this will only add to this. The local people will not benefit at all from these developments it will just cause more problems.

]]> Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:44:34 UTC 10819763 hyad hanaannah [Signature #92] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818623?utm_medium=rss we are too little to change the mind of those developers, they don't care what we say not even as much as the dirt under their nails, if they reduce the levels of the building it won't change anything at all! they should make a car park oppossite!! the council should help us with this matter! there is nowhere in the area where to park our cars! this is a trouble for many families in the 2 small blocks from the landmark. im even afraid those towers will fall when building them can you imagine??!

]]> Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:48:31 UTC 10818623 hillary mc lanne [Signature #91] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818579?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:36:07 UTC 10818579 tom bakh [Signature #90] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818578?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:35:23 UTC 10818578 anna zenini [Signature #89] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818576?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:34:44 UTC 10818576 sumayah hatarq [Signature #88] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818571?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:34:01 UTC 10818571 leo janorme [Signature #87] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818566?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:33:23 UTC 10818566 Anonymous [Signature #86] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818563?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:32:33 UTC 10818563 Anonymous [Signature #85] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818555?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:31:45 UTC 10818555 Anonymous [Signature #84] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818549?utm_medium=rss Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:30:50 UTC 10818549 Anonymous [Signature #83] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10818531?utm_medium=rss we don't have space on cuba street ourselves, how about when you bring your trucks and trailers and raise up in the air tones of building equipment, the landmark is half only populated where from do you still want to bring people, we are packed behind the buildings anyway and our cars are weekly picked up by the council we have nowhere to park because we are poor and the underground parking has been open to the rich only who pay rent! kids wait in line to enter schools and go to doctors.

]]> Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:29:11 UTC 10818531 Ozgur Uzuner [Signature #82] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10814825?utm_medium=rss Please stop this!

]]> Wed, 6 Jul 2011 04:15:24 UTC 10814825 Ian Muir [Signature #81] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10814680?utm_medium=rss I feel that the size of this development is out of all proportion to the size of the site. The recent Landmark development has incorporated 2 smaller blocks on it's site which makes 4 blocks - 2 high, 2 low. Together with the space within the Landmark site it makes much more sense than the 2 high rise blocks on such a tiny site. The surrounding low rise housing will be massively dwarfed which seems unreasonable given that they have been here for some time. The parking will be a huge problem too.

]]> Wed, 6 Jul 2011 03:58:02 UTC 10814680 ibrahim ahmed ahmed [Signature #80] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10812512?utm_medium=rss Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:06:58 UTC 10812512 Anonymous [Signature #79] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10809490?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Jul 2011 05:31:39 UTC 10809490 Crina Burroughs [Signature #78] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10808895?utm_medium=rss Tue, 5 Jul 2011 02:24:06 UTC 10808895 Jasmine Hu [Signature #77] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10807020?utm_medium=rss The construction will be disruptive to the community

]]> Tue, 5 Jul 2011 05:24:53 UTC 10807020 Anonymous [Signature #76] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10805916?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Jul 2011 09:51:41 UTC 10805916 Anahita Patwardhan [Signature #75] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10805207?utm_medium=rss I object to this planning application. The plot is too small for such a tall tower and will make the area very congested. The height and the housing density of the proposed application is not in line with the local area. The proposed building will negatively impact the residents of the area. It will block out light and overlook properties in the Landmark development leading to a loss of privacy. I am concerned about building noise for the 42 months of construction, as it is so close by.

]]> Mon, 4 Jul 2011 04:47:50 UTC 10805207 Anonymous [Signature #74] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10804376?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Jul 2011 12:52:39 UTC 10804376 Bevan Whitehead [Signature #73] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10803361?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Jul 2011 07:34:34 UTC 10803361 Anonymous [Signature #72] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10802596?utm_medium=rss Canary Wharf is already saturated with residential properties which is bringing the value of others down. Unless your are putting better buildings in the place of ugly council estates this developemtn will not benefit the area.

]]> Mon, 4 Jul 2011 04:03:10 UTC 10802596 Cesar Guerra-Reyes [Signature #71] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10802594?utm_medium=rss Mon, 4 Jul 2011 04:02:16 UTC 10802594 Anonymous [Signature #70] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10799916?utm_medium=rss This proposed development is far too dense for the size of the plot and the towers, given their size, are too close to existing residential towers (Landmark). A low rise development of 6 to 8 storeys would be more appropriate.

]]> Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:01:02 UTC 10799916 Biliana Whitehead [Signature #69] https://www.gopetition.com/signature/locate/10799331?utm_medium=rss Sun, 3 Jul 2011 06:03:58 UTC 10799331