Objections to Rafts Redevelopment, Eton Petition: Signature List Feed

Mr Mark Caudell [Signature #241]

Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:13:39 UTC

Mr Mark Caudell

Mr Anonymous [Signature #240]

Sat, 19 Feb 2011 04:39:05 UTC

Anonymous

Anonymous [Signature #239]

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:41:18 UTC

Anonymous

Anonymous [Signature #238]

Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:16:03 UTC

Anonymous

NEVER!

Miss Marian Burke [Signature #237]

Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:04:04 UTC

Miss Marian Burke

These boathouses are an important part of Eton's history and especially as that stretch of the river recives so many tourists and visitors, I think it would be a crying shame to tear them down and redevelop in their place.

Hayley Edwards [Signature #236]

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 02:49:17 UTC

Hayley Edwards

This development will ruin the view and compromise the historic appeal of the immediate area. It must NOT go ahead.

Mrs Jan Fredrickson [Signature #235]

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 02:09:23 UTC

Mrs Jan Fredrickson

It's not just that these boat houses have been part of the riverside scene in Windsor/Eton for so many years; it's more that what is proposed is so utterly out of keeping. We have enough over-priced dwellings on that stretch of river!

Mrs Margaret Campbell [Signature #234]

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:43:30 UTC

Mrs Margaret Campbell

Mr Phil Brown [Signature #233]

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:32:22 UTC

Mr Phil Brown

Mrs Anne Brown [Signature #232]

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:11:28 UTC

Mrs Anne Brown

Mr David Usher [Signature #231]

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 09:21:27 UTC

Mr David Usher

Mrs Joanne James [Signature #230]

Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:17:18 UTC

Mrs Joanne James

As an Eton resident i feel this type of development would be extremely detrimental to such a lovely area. Rafts is part of Eton's heritage and definately depicts the history of Eton Colleges boating history.
I also feel that the extra construction traffic into the town will cause chaos causing damage and destruction to local roads and much inconvenience to residents.
What a shame that something that is such a huge part of Eton is even being considered by the borough for demolition.

Mr Edward Nelson [Signature #229]

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 02:53:06 UTC

Mr Edward Nelson

We must do all we can to retain some of the original substance of this very historic area. If this is allowed to continue, in years to come, people will look at old photographs and ask themselves, why did these people let this happen?

Anonymous [Signature #228]

Sun, 6 Feb 2011 02:51:24 UTC

Anonymous

Please do not destroy part of our heritage and replace it with another modern monstrosity.

mr Luke Vancliffe-Davis [Signature #227]

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 06:15:53 UTC

mr Luke Vancliffe-Davis

Mr Nicholas Warner [Signature #226]

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 01:40:15 UTC

Mr Nicholas Warner

Bit by bit our building heritage is being eroded (look at Daniel on Peascod Street), and these boathouses are in a very strategic position. This will damage Windsor's tourist standing. In addition the narrow roads will be unable to cope.

Ms Helen Prior [Signature #225]

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 10:07:57 UTC

Ms Helen Prior

These buildings are part of Windsor and Etons history and heritage. Its not only the residents of the town who want to preserve these important buildings but also the many tourists who come to visit the town to appreciate its history and architecture.

Ms Joan Bryant [Signature #224]

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:37:30 UTC

Ms Joan Bryant

The domestic scale of the boathouses and their historic association with the river front
should be protected.

Mr Garrick Davis [Signature #223]

Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:25:32 UTC

Mr Garrick Davis

Boating on the river Thames: its culture and the examples of the vernacular styles of building associated with this pasttime and sport, are an important part of our national heritage and our local identity.These examples here at Eton & Windsor riverside must be retained for the future.

Mrs Marion Voakes [Signature #222]

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 04:19:59 UTC

Mrs Marion Voakes

The development has too many properties being built for the size of the plot and will result in the loss of older properties and cause more congestion given the limited number of parking spaces currently available in Eton for residents and visitors alike.

Nina Waters [Signature #221]

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 02:26:14 UTC

Nina Waters

Coralie Voakes [Signature #220]

Fri, 4 Feb 2011 02:22:22 UTC

Coralie Voakes

Mrs Lindsey Lucas [Signature #219]

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:16:01 UTC

Mrs Lindsey Lucas

Mrs Marion Voakes [Signature #218]

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:27:51 UTC

Mrs Marion Voakes

Mr Brian Voakes [Signature #217]

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 09:21:19 UTC

Mr Brian Voakes

Louise Davison [Signature #216]

Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:27:45 UTC

Louise Davison

The development is too dense and, in addition, will increase traffic in the whole of Eton which is already in crisis!

Mr Geoffrey Peatfield [Signature #215]

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:05:14 UTC

Mr Geoffrey Peatfield

I agree with the above statement.

mrs patricia peatfield [Signature #214]

Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:59:40 UTC

mrs patricia peatfield

I agree with the above statement.

mr colin curl [Signature #213]

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:11:52 UTC

mr colin curl

Mrs Kim Thurston [Signature #212]

Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:34:48 UTC

Mrs Kim Thurston

What ARE you thinking of?

Mrs Joanna Davidson [Signature #211]

Sat, 22 Jan 2011 02:10:31 UTC

Mrs Joanna Davidson

Mr Paul Davidson [Signature #210]

Sat, 22 Jan 2011 02:07:26 UTC

Mr Paul Davidson

Dr william wraight [Signature #209]

Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:39:31 UTC

Dr william wraight

Higher buildings than existing will overpower that area of Eton and THe Brocas

Miss Ana Alvarez [Signature #208]

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:04:04 UTC

Miss Ana Alvarez

Mr Bryan Thompson [Signature #207]

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:02:39 UTC

Mr Bryan Thompson

Mr Donald Wakeham [Signature #206]

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:44:22 UTC

Mr Donald Wakeham

This proposed development is too large and not in keeping with the surrounding area and should be soundly rejected.

Mr David Wright [Signature #205]

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 04:15:37 UTC

Mr David Wright

Footpath should be a public right of way to the Brocas which is a local treasure. To think of building a road on the Brocas is criminal.

Mrs Hannah Wright [Signature #204]

Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:14:38 UTC

Mrs Hannah Wright

We should not let this happen! Don't demolish! How about renovating instead?

mr Alan Hodgson [Signature #203]

Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:41:59 UTC

mr Alan Hodgson

Mr Charles Haynes [Signature #202]

Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:41:24 UTC

Mr Charles Haynes

Miss Helena Carter [Signature #201]

Tue, 4 Jan 2011 03:39:55 UTC

Miss Helena Carter

Mr Simon Davies [Signature #200]

Tue, 4 Jan 2011 03:11:41 UTC

Mr Simon Davies

Ms D Lamond [Signature #199]

Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:46:11 UTC

Ms D Lamond

Ms S Curtain [Signature #198]

Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:43:13 UTC

Ms S Curtain

Mr C Clash [Signature #197]

Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:38:11 UTC

Mr C Clash

Ms R Jerzewski [Signature #196]

Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:35:22 UTC

Ms R Jerzewski

Mr Paul Oatway [Signature #195]

Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:31:48 UTC

Mr Paul Oatway

Mrs Linda Oatway [Signature #194]

Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:27:18 UTC

Mrs Linda Oatway

George Fussey [Signature #193]

Sun, 2 Jan 2011 07:54:25 UTC

George Fussey

I have profound concerns for the environmental impact on the Brocas especially after the lasting damage done to South Meadow following the recent St John’s Square development.

Mr Antti Keskisaari [Signature #192]

Fri, 31 Dec 2010 02:07:53 UTC

Mr Antti Keskisaari

Ms Daina Davies [Signature #191]

Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:27:57 UTC

Ms Daina Davies

Mrs Rachel Cross [Signature #190]

Tue, 28 Dec 2010 05:07:15 UTC

Mrs Rachel Cross

Leave traditional Windsor alone!

Mr Patrick Johnson [Signature #189]

Mon, 27 Dec 2010 08:54:40 UTC

Mr Patrick Johnson

Mrs Susan Harvard [Signature #188]

Sun, 26 Dec 2010 03:47:26 UTC

Mrs Susan Harvard

Proposed development is a mish mash of styles, too large in scale and with many inappropriate details such as Venetian windows in the gables, curious diagonal wood cladding in conjunction with Regency style balustrades and canopied balconies. The materials spec seems of high quality but cannot compensate for shortcomings in design.
Conservation area should be respected and Historic Buildings with original character purpose and integrity should not be destroyed in favour of this Disney creation

Mr Steevan Glover [Signature #187]

Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:47:57 UTC

Mr Steevan Glover

To replace such historic boat houses with trite modern dwellings would be a travesty and make a mockery of the wonderful heritage of Windsor and Eton.

Mr James Harvard [Signature #186]

Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:26:24 UTC

Mr James Harvard

Mrs Angela Cottrell-Dormer [Signature #185]

Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:25:08 UTC

Mrs Angela Cottrell-Dormer

Mr Charles Cottrell-Dormer [Signature #184]

Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:16:45 UTC

Mr Charles Cottrell-Dormer

Mrs Priscilla Slipper [Signature #183]

Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:52:28 UTC

Mrs Priscilla Slipper

6 generations of my family have enjoyed the right to walk,play and relax on the brocas and i was born in Emlyns Buildings overlooking it. Right of way is clearly shown on early 15th C map. All building in vicinity has to take into account the world famous view of the castle from the Brocas. Such a development would destroy the quality of life for residents during construction and if allowed the pressure on parking etc would make this a very dangerous and end enviropentally unsound place.

Mrs Hester Davenport [Signature #182]

Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:37:38 UTC

Mrs Hester Davenport

There is over-development of the Windsor/Eton banks of the Thames has already (witness the appalling 'green monster' on the opposite bank). Further development on such a large scale should be resisted as detrimental to the local environment.

MrS Penny Dollimore [Signature #181]

Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:35:26 UTC

MrS Penny Dollimore

Mr Rodney Dollimore [Signature #180]

Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:33:45 UTC

Mr Rodney Dollimore

Mr Andrew Jones [Signature #179]

Wed, 22 Dec 2010 04:17:28 UTC

Mr Andrew Jones

The buildings in Eton help to generate its unique character, we should not allow this to be stripped away and replaced by a complete monstrosity.

Mr Tim Gyngell [Signature #178]

Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:46:53 UTC

Mr Tim Gyngell

Ms Julia Halpin [Signature #177]

Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:30:28 UTC

Ms Julia Halpin

Mr Andy Stevenson [Signature #176]

Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:28:54 UTC

Mr Andy Stevenson

Dr Huw Davies [Signature #175]

Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:11:11 UTC

Dr Huw Davies

Dr Anonymous [Signature #174]

Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:00:19 UTC

Anonymous

Mr Tyrone Stodart [Signature #173]

Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:56:59 UTC

Mr Tyrone Stodart

Mr Roger Loderick [Signature #172]

Mon, 20 Dec 2010 04:54:36 UTC

Mr Roger Loderick

Ms Anonymous [Signature #171]

Mon, 20 Dec 2010 05:46:58 UTC

Anonymous

The scale and height of the building is too dominant and should be abandoned or revised

Mr Michael Walker [Signature #170]

Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:16:23 UTC

Mr Michael Walker

Miss Hannah Massey [Signature #169]

Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:13:26 UTC

Miss Hannah Massey

Miss Katrina Fossey [Signature #168]

Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:44:02 UTC

Miss Katrina Fossey

Mr Anthony Cove [Signature #167]

Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:53:22 UTC

Mr Anthony Cove

I object to the loss of River House, there is no space to park ONE car on the surface, they plan to build underground parking for 40 cars, & when we have floods? The thought of a fenced road across the Brocus is horrendous even IF it is only temporary, the hard surface on South Meadow is still there.

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #166]

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 01:56:33 UTC

Anonymous

Mrs Paula Golding [Signature #165]

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:35:10 UTC

Mrs Paula Golding

Mr Steven Ithurralde [Signature #164]

Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:25:01 UTC

Mr Steven Ithurralde

This development, not only destoys an historical site, but provides an over development of a site without providing adequate parking or access.
The building could be refurbished to provide a smaller number of social housing flats, to enable more of the local poulations children to stay in the village

Mr Richard Pinchbeck [Signature #163]

Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:14:57 UTC

Mr Richard Pinchbeck

What is the point of defining a conservation area to then alter what has been protected? I object to such a development that changes the architectural integrity of this historic site.

miss Anonymous [Signature #162]

Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:05:36 UTC

Anonymous

Why do people want to keep ruining places, Please leave things just the way they are. Change is not always for the better.

Mrs Steph Lickley [Signature #161]

Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:45:38 UTC

Mrs Steph Lickley

An ugly development was given planning permission on the old Eton Excelsior site - far too big - supposed to be only 3 storeys ???? Look what is now opposite ! Shops demolished to give way to new flats facing South Meadow. We don't want another eye sore !! Leave the Brocas in tact !! To much demolition of older house to make way for flats that no one can afford !!!

mr clive lickley [Signature #160]

Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:58:49 UTC

mr clive lickley

A gross overdevelopment of an important site and contrary to stated Conservation Area policy adopted by the Council.Better to utilise buildings already there for live/work units.Bewlay Homes scheme at St John's Sq in Eton adds nothing to community feel of Eton and is a gated enclave which this scheme looks like replicating!

mr peter finke [Signature #159]

Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:45:49 UTC

mr peter finke

mrs Elizabeth Hooper [Signature #158]

Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:17:38 UTC

mrs Elizabeth Hooper

FAR TO MUCH DEVELOPMENT IN WINDSOR. THE INFASTRUCTURE CANNOT COPE, TOO MANY PEOPLE AND NO PARKING ETC ETC
ANOTHER BEAUTIFULL BUILDING DEMOLISHED FOR PROFIT

Mr Raymond Wallis [Signature #157]

Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:05:20 UTC

Mr Raymond Wallis

Mrs Honor Wallis [Signature #156]

Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:12:34 UTC

Mrs Honor Wallis

Miss Elizabeth Harvard [Signature #155]

Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:32:21 UTC

Miss Elizabeth Harvard

These buildings are located within a conservation area & although not listed, they have been identified as significant by English Heritage. The buildings form part of Eton College's heritage & are also an important & longstanding feature of the river-front. As such, Eton College should be looking to preserve them rather than demolishing them for financial gain, without any consideration for the historical loss. In addition, the proposed new development is inappropriate for the surrounding area.

Miss Sheila Murphy [Signature #154]

Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:26:26 UTC

Miss Sheila Murphy

beatrice stait [Signature #153]

Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:20:41 UTC

beatrice stait

Mrs Linda Elliott [Signature #152]

Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:36:49 UTC

Mrs Linda Elliott

Sara Henderson-Kemp [Signature #151]

Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:45:49 UTC

Sara Henderson-Kemp

Dr Alexis Warnes [Signature #150]

Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:16:58 UTC

Dr Alexis Warnes

mr simon thomas [Signature #149]

Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:00:03 UTC

mr simon thomas

The proposed development is too large for the site and will dominate the surrounding area and put increased traffic pressure on the small adjacent road.
There will be conflict between servicing the site by the roadway across the Brocas and its public amenity use and damage to the environment.

Mr Andrew Crickmore [Signature #148]

Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:03:09 UTC

Mr Andrew Crickmore

Anonymous [Signature #147]

Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:03:44 UTC

Anonymous

Rose Rawson [Signature #146]

Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:54:21 UTC

Rose Rawson

Anonymous [Signature #145]

Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:49:06 UTC

Anonymous

Mrs Anonymous [Signature #144]

Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:41:28 UTC

Anonymous

Mr Michael May [Signature #143]

Mon, 13 Dec 2010 10:42:30 UTC

Mr Michael May

I have been a resident of Eton for 25 years. I am a member of the Eton Neighbourhood Action Group and a Director of Tangier Lane Management Company. The proposed development will, my opinion, damage the town environment and add to the already critical traffic and residential parking problems. Consent should be refused.

Mrs Liz Brandt [Signature #142]

Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:05:35 UTC

Mrs Liz Brandt