Active petitions in over 75 countries Follow GoPetition

Petition Tag - canada

1. Overturn warrantless cell phone searches

Recently the Supreme Court of Canada has voted (4-3) to allow for the warrantless search of cell phones by police on the suspicion a crime has been committed.

This is a gross invasion of our privacy.

I do not wish to live in a police state and will not sit idly by while our freedoms are stripped from us one by one.

View petition

2. Stop passenger flights to and from Ebola countries

With the current outbreak of Ebola, we as Canadians have the right to be protected form cases of ebola that could enter the country by flights to and from the affected countries.

View petition

3. Help a German Family after a horrible time to stay in Canada

Dear Immigration Government of Canada:

We are a German Family (Elena 27, Martin 48) with two girls, Clarissa 9 and Fabienne 6. We came to Canada in June 2013 as visitors. Our main reason was not to visit Canada but to find refuse in Canada, a place that we know has a fair justice system and where families can raise their children in a peaceful environment.

Germany is not known to be a country where you flee from but our family does not feel safe in Germany and this is why we are writing to you, we want to share our story and ask for permanent residence in your country.

It was the 19th of September 2012 in a city in Germany called Regensburg. On this day, we took our girls to Kindergarten and School like every day. Around 2 pm my husband got a phone call from the Youth Welfare Department and they told him that they had taken our kids away claiming that they wouldn’t be safe with us. After this shocking phone call, my husband rushed to my workplace at around 2:30 pm, and with tears in his eyes he told me the horrific phone call that he got. I was shocked. We immediately drove to the Youth Welfare office.

When we arrived there, nobody wanted to speak with us. Desperately, we went to the office of a higher official. We were able to reach him and so we asked him why they had taken our kids away and where they were but he said he couldn’t give us that information and he threaten us saying he would call the police if we didn’t leave. It was so heartbreaking for us because we didn't even know where and how are girls were.

Three days later the woman responsible for taking our kids called us to tell us that, if we wanted we can come to talk with her. It had been three days of no answers and anguish that we didn’t hesitate and went to see her right away. When we arrived at her office, she gave us a letter and we began to read. What we read was unbelievable. The letter claimed that we sexually abused our kids and did a lot of other horrible things. We couldn’t believe it. We didn’t know where they had gotten all those lies from. We told them that nothing in the letter was true but she didn’t seem to care, she was just smiling. We cried asking her where our kids were and we asked her for a phone number where we could reach them. She said that they were about 200 km away from our home.

We insisted several times, asking her where our girls were and we wanted a phone number desperately, until finally she gave it to us. After meeting with her we drove to our lawyer and gave her all the documents we got from the welfare department. She read it and the one thing she advised us was that we shouldn't sign anything without her approval since the welfare department had planned to call us in a few days to sign several papers. We had no contact the first three weeks with our daughters; we didn't even know how they were. NOTHING! My husband and I cried the whole time without answers, wondering how they could have made up lies to take our girls away. All of our friends and family were shocked; they knew that we would never do what the letter claimed we did to our daughters.

One day, looking for ways to get our daughters back, my husband and I had an idea to proof to the Youth Welfare Department that our daughters were okay with us and that nothing had happened to them physically. We went to our daughters’ doctor’s office and we told him what had happened. He, like everyone else, was shocked. He said that he couldn’t believe someone could think we would do something like that. He knew our daughters and did regular checks on them and had never seen bruises or any hint of sexual abuse. He wrote a letter testifying on our behalf, stating that he had known our daughters for a while, that he had been their doctor for years and he never saw anything abnormal. The same information was validated by two other doctors, 28 other people like family, friends and neighbors. Nonetheless, the welfare Department said our letters weren’t valid and outrageously enough, the court said that the same thing.

When the Welfare Department decided to let us speak with our daughters, they wanted us to lie to our kids the first day we would have contact. They wanted us to tell them that they were on vacation and not in foster care. We didn’t agree. As soon as we talked with our kids we told them the truth and they started to cry and scream. They wanted to go home to mommy and daddy. Since then, we recorded all the phone calls with everybody who was involved in our case and we still have all of the recordings. We tried for nine long months to proof our innocence. At the third and last court day we finally had success. After the our daughters had spent months in horror away from their parents, the court finally decided that we would get our girls back with all the parental rights and all that belonged to our family.

After the judge made the last statement, the lady from the Welfare Department came to us and told us that she would come back again and take our kids and that this next time we would never see them again. She smiled with such sarcasm and shook my husband’s hand. She tried the same with me but I could not take her mockery and I turned around without shaking her hand. How could I? She was the one who stole our daughters and lied for nine months. She took away the children of a regular family, a family who had everything: their own house, an apartment, work and a great family life.

We got our daughters back on the 17th of May 2013 and that’s when decided to leave Germany. We left on June 28th of 2013. We left everything back in Germany; family, friends, work, and house, everything to live in peace and help our daughters move on from the fear that this bitter experience left.

However, it has not been easy. After two months of being here in Canada, my daughters began to open up about what they had lived in the foster home they were placed at. Fabienne, my youngest daughter came one day to me and said, “mommy can I talk with you about all of what happened? “ I agreed and she began to tell me things a mother or father would never want to hear. She told me that the foster care wanted her older sister to do sexual things with another boy while the adult was watching them. She said Clarissa needed to put “the boy’s thing” in her mouth. I asked my daughter Clarissa if she wanted to talk about it with me but she ran away and didn't want to talk because she was ashamed. I told her she could come anytime, when she was ready to talk to me or daddy about that. A few weeks later she asked me if she could talk to me so long as she could stay with us and not send her away for this. Of course, I agreed and she told me the same thing my younger daughter had told me. She said she was forced to do sexual things with a boy while the adults watched them. She also told me that they got kicked and were forced to stay outside in the wintertime (-15 C). Whenever they would say they didn’t like something, for example spinach, they would swear at them calling them asshole and bastard. They would also yell at Fabienne because she began to pee in her bed from the fear. As a consequence they made my five year old daughter wash her clothes by hand saying that she needed to learn not to pee in her bed or clothes. Clarissa and Fabienne were not allowed to turn the heater in their room on because it costs money and so their room became colder than the temperature outside.

Being in Canada our daughters have found some form of peace and rest because they know those people are far away; but the fear is still present. They still get scared if someone knocks on the door and they don't know who. They hide every time they hear the door because they don’t want anybody to come and take them away again. Every week that passes, they feel with more liberty to share their experience and I listen, but deep down it kills me to hear and know what my babies went through.

They stole nine months of our lives, they scarred a normal family for life and nobody can give us those nine months back, nobody will be able to erase the terror and abuse they let my daughters go through.

We love our girls with all of our heart and they love mommy and daddy too. We don’t want to go back to Germany and live in fear. My husband and I want the best for our daughters and being in Canada has brought more emotional and mental stability than we could ever hope for after the abuse we went through in our country.

I beg you; please help our family to stay here in Canada. Help us live without fear and live a normal family life together with our kids. We want the best for our daughters, and this is why we are here. We have all the court papers and all the recordings with us here in Canada for your reference.

Thank you so very much for the attention you give to this desperate call for help.

We also made a video on Youtube/Twitter/Facebook: --->
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hvgad5mLsY <---

Please help us to raise the needed money
http://www.gofundme.com/hh14m8


Sincerely,

Clarissa, Fabienne, Martin and Elena Schuster

View petition

4. Provide Educational Resources to the Displaced Child Refugees of Syria

As a result of the ongoing Syrian Conflict, education in the neighbouring refugee camps is sadly lacking or non existent. Children from all countries and all beliefs deserve the same developmental opportunities that we grew up with in Canada.

Without it the basic foundations of learning the children of Syria will never be able to properly understand the situations they find themselves in and will be easily susceptible to coercion. A proper education now is the key to stopping military action in the future.

Friends Of Syria Canada is petitioning the Canadian government for their commitment in providing educational resources to the over 1 million children seeking safety in the neighbouring countries of Lebanon and Jordan. In an emergency meeting held by Parliament to discuss Canada's plans to confront ISIL on September 16th, preventative military measures were discussed but humanitarian aid efforts were disregarded.

Immigration Minister Chris Alexander is quoted as saying "Our goal is to deter and prevent terrorism worldwide". As of now ISIL believed to have between 20,000 to 30,000 members, and the cost of fighting them is already exceeding a billion dollars. Imagine what the damage and costs will be if they were only to recruit even as low as 10% of Syria's children.

The rest of Minister Alexander's quote is "Our goal is to prevent Canadians from being involved more than they already are". The fact is ALL Canadians are involved. Terrorism effects our lives everyday.

We pay for higher levels of security, we pay for our privacy to be monitered, we pay for our soldiers to fight battles, and we pay for all the lives that are lost. Sign our petition now and show the Canadian government that we want to pay for a better future for the children Syria and for the world.

View petition

5. Turks & Caicos Movement to Join Canada as an Eleventh Province

The premier of Turks and Caicos is leaving the door open to the prospect of his country joining Canada, even though he has opposed the idea in the past.

But Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird suggested Monday that Canadians are dreaming if they think they'll have a province in the Caribbean any time soon.

Turks and Caicos Premier Rufus Ewing met Prime Minister Stephen Harper in Ottawa, where he says the two leaders spoke about exploring a more formal relationship.

Ewing described the meeting as a "courtship," but said the pair did not discuss the possibility of Turks and Caicos becoming Canada's 11th province.

The idea, however, is not out of the question, Ewing suggested during a news conference following the meeting.

"It is not of my mandate to close the door," he said.

"It is my mandate to see Turks and Caicos have sustainable economic growth and development and development of our people ... and we look to Canada, who has shown by example of being a very strong democracy."

Even creating closer ties is a long shot, said Baird: the Harper government is not exploring a stronger relationship, let alone considering a plan to annex the British colonial territory.

"We're not in the business of annexing islands in the Caribbean to be part of Canada, so that's not something that we're exploring," said Baird.

"We're not looking at any sort of formal association with the islands."

Some provinces, however, appear open to the idea.

While Ewing was in Ottawa, P.E.I. Premier Robert Ghiz tweeted to Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall that he'd be happy to partner with the Prairie province on the Turks and Caicos project.

Conservative MP Peter Goldring has been pushing the idea for over a decade, arguing that Canada needs its own Hawaii.

Canada enjoyed strong economic ties with Turks and Caicos in the 1800s, largely through the salt trade.

More recently, however, the 40-island nation has relied more on the tourist trade and its open banking system for the economic well-being of its roughly 30,000 inhabitants.

Turks and Caicos is currently a British territory with an elected legislature.

View petition

6. Canadian Jobs at Risk Without Temporary Foreign Worker Access

The restaurant industry employs 1.2 million Canadians and is one of the largest sectors and job creators in the Canadian economy.

In select markets there are critical labour shortages and restaurant owners don't have enough applicants for available jobs. The Temporary Foreign Worker Program allows restaurants to fully staff their operations. In some markets, restaurant owners would have to scale back their business and even close their doors without these workers.

Only when restaurant owners exhaust efforts to hire Canadians, are they allowed to hire temporary foreign workers.

Temporary foreign workers help us protect ALL restaurant jobs.

The restaurant industry is committed to working with the government to ensure the integrity and responsible use of the program while protecting Canadian jobs.

Right now there is a ban on our use of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program.

View petition

7. Petition Against Wifi in Camps Across Canada

The Canadian Press reports that Parks Canada has put out a call for bids from contractors capable of installing Internet access points in as many as 150 national park locations over the next three years – 50 this year alone. This is enraging. The Walterdale Bridge construction in Edmonton alone disrupted 17,000 square metres of fishery habitat, but this internet access construction will destroy thousands of square kilometres of forestry, grassland and potentially fishery as well.

The physical environment on the earth provides favorable conditions for the existence and growth of different life forms, including man. These living beings constitute the biological environment. Both the physical and biological environments are in a close interaction with each other and form a stable self perpetuating system. To take away the small amount of interaction with nature campers seek is preposterous and also violates environmental rights on many accounts.

Taken directly from the Environmental Bill of Rights for Canada:
"As early as 1978, a survey conducted for Environment Canada found that 89% of Canadians considered the deterioration of the natural environment to be of major concern.(2) This finding has been reinforced by subsequent polls, including the December 1990 Gallup Poll, which indicated that more than two-thirds of Canadians are buying "environmentally friendly" products.(3)"

The environment is constantly changing and this affects life on earth; some these effects can be lasting and irreversible. So we must realize that we should be concerned about environment, even moreso in our protected National Parks. Today, when environment is being polluted so rigorously, everyone has only one question on his / her lips and mind that is how to save environment from being polluted. How do we protect the earth from disaster? The strongest way to protect environment is save trees. Trees are one of the main creations that play an important role to keep air clean. If there will be no fresh air available then how will human beings, animal, and birds survive? Therefore, a clean environment is the need for every living object on this earth. Destroying said habitat will hinder the growth of animal life in our parks, as well as the spiritual connection required between man and nature.

View petition

8. Send the Caregiver's Champion Filipino Canadian to Canada Parliament

Lawyer Rafael Fabregas worked tirelessly to get the Juana Tejada Law onto the law books in Canada.

Working together with his client Tejada, they brought reform to the country’s live-in caregiver program by making it fairer for caregivers and their families to gain permanent residence status. Tejada had been denied permanent status because she fell ill; she died of cancer before the law was passed on International Women's Day of 2009.

Through Fabregas, Juana acquired permanent residency status in Canada and the amendment to the immigration law they sought was passed and is now known as "The Juana Tejada Law".

Fabregas' belief in fairness and justice led him to be a lawyer and it is also how he lives his life. He continues to help others and takes "pro bono" cases as he did for Tejada, without financial considerations and only in the name of public service.

View petition

9. National Childcare Plan in Canada

"Parents, on average (except in Quebec), cover 50% of program costs – the fourth highest rate among select OECD countries" (TD Special Report, TD Economics, 2012).

"Quebec has the most comprehensive program, as it universally provides $7 per day child care for children aged 0-12 (including before and after school care)" (TD Special Report, TD Economics, 2012).

"Studies show some positive effects following the implementation of the program, including a rise in the female participation rate from lowest to highest in Canada, moving above the national average on standardized test scores, an increase in fertility rates and a 50% reduction in poverty. Quebec also has the lowest share – by a large margin – of 2-4 year-olds who receive parental care only compared to other provinces" (TD Special Report, TD Economics, 2012).

View petition

10. Stop the Canadian Seal Slaughter

It all started in the 1800s. Seals migrated from Greenland to the coast of Newfoundland to breed, only to find greedy hunters with deadly clubs. They clubbed the thousands of seals to death every year.

The most terrible thing is, they still do it now, even though most countries have stopped importing seal fur. The way of death for these lovely animals is terrible and cruel. It must stop.

View petition

11. Make Mr. Stephen Harper Make A Public Apology

Government sends cheque for 1 cent to soldier’s mother in ‘fragile state’ after son committed suicide.

Quoted from the National Post.

OTTAWA — Canada’s defence minister has apologized to the family of a soldier whose mother received a government cheque for one penny following her son’s death upon his return from Afghanistan.

Rob Nicholson says an “insensitive bureaucratic screw-up” resulted in the one-cent cheque being sent to the mother of Cpl. Justin Stark.

The cheque, dated Feb. 28, was sent from the Public Works department and was marked as “CF Release Pay.”

It’s not clear why it was sent, but a clearly incensed Nicholson told the House of Commons that he would look into the matter.

Cpl. Justin Stark was a 22-year-old Canadian Forces reservist and an infantry soldier with the Argyle and Sutherland Highlanders of Canada who killed himself in the John W. Foote VC Armouries in Hamilton in October 2011. His seven-month tour of Afghanistan had ended earlier that same year.

It’s humiliating and degrading. Several tribunals were held to determine whether Stark’s death was related to his tour of duty, but it was unclear whether they ever reached a conclusion.

New Democrat MP Wayne Marston says the cheque has made matters worse for Stark’s mother, Denise, who he described as being in a “fragile state.”

Marston says he appreciated Nicholson’s pledge to look into the matter, but that he didn’t want to assign blame for the cheque being issued.

Rather, he said, Nicholson should put measures in place to ensure that a similar incident doesn’t happen in the future.

“It’s humiliating and degrading,” Keven Ellis, the president of the North Wall Riders Association, a motorcycle club that supports soldiers and their families with fundraising and events, told cbc.ca.

“It took the wind out of her sails,” said Ellis, who is speaking on behalf of the family because Stark’s mother is just “too distraught.”

“It’s been 2½ years and she gets a cheque in the mail from the government addressed to her son for one cent? This woman lost her son, and it seems like all these things keep falling on her.”

Well, Mr. Harper, you sure screwed that one up. When you finally tried to prove you paid separation pay to the vets, you send a cheque that can't be cashed. Don't you remember, you took out the penny. so no funds available. I urge you Mr. Harper to do the right thing and make a Public apology to the poor mother. Do you not have Respect for out VETS ? or people that have served or are serving our country, It is times like this I am ashamed to be Canadian.

View petition

12. The RCMP abuses C-68

Swiss Arms Confiscated

Effective 10:00 pm eastern tonight the RCMP has reclassified the Swiss Arms Classic Green carbine from non-restricted (and restricted) to prohibited status. There are approximately 1,000 -1,800 of these firearms in the public. The government will not be offering compensation and will be demanding that the firearms, which cost between $3,000 - $4,000 be surrendered. The government is suggesting that all affected firearms owners contact the distributers from which the firearms were purchased for reimbursement.

The NFA encourages all affected owners to contact their federal Member of Parliament. This is part of an ongoing agenda of the RCMP to progressively prohibit firearms in Canada.

Under Bill C-68, the firearms classification system was supposed to be updated regularly to prohibit firearms being introduced into the market, as well as those already in Canada.

The Government of Canada was supposed to assist in this with periodic new legislation and Order in Council (OIC).

The RCMP have been doing this unilaterally since 2006. Access to information records show that RCMP have an aggressive firearms reclassification agenda, and that prohibitions will not stop with the Swiss Arms Series Rifles. These rifles were approved for import by the RCMP have been sold in Canada for over a decade. Owners once held registrations for them under the now defunct long gun registry.
There has never been a crime or incident of violence committed with one of these rifles.

NFA condemns this RCMP assault on the rights and private property of law abiding Canadians. The RCMP has shown contempt for the rights of Canadians by their actions, and we expect the Government of Canada to take steps and introduce measures to reign in the RCMP and end the assault against the rights, property and freedoms of Canadians.

If you wish to join the support group please goto!

https://www.facebook.com/groups/221239064736413/

View petition

13. Corriger le projet de loi S209 "modification de l'article 83 du Code pénal"

ATTN: La Chambre des communes du Canada, le Parlement du Canada, le Sénat du Canada, Ministère de Tourisme, Culture et Sport, Ministère de Services aux consommateurs

Les municipalités ainsi que leurs départements qui émettent les permis, citent souvent l’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada pour justifier de ne pas émettre de permis pour les Arts Martiaux Mixtes Amateurs et même pour les évènements de sports de combat dans lesquels il n’y a pas de contacts. Le nouvel article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada est utilisé comme une façon de monopoliser le contrôle des fonds des payeurs de taxes de même que le sport. Les sénateurs ont été avertis du risque potentiel d’interprétation erronée et mauvaise du futur article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada, au moment des discussions entourant l’adoption du projet de loi S209. Hors contrôle, les efforts des aspirants athlètes, des entraîneurs ainsi que des organisations permanentes existant de longue date, qui ont aidé et continuent à aider, à cultiver ce sport, seront voués à l’échec. Les pouvoirs contenus dans le nouvel article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada, sont tellement vastes et confères aux titulaires des droits, des pouvoirs de monopole tellement vastes, qui pourraient être utilisés dans le but de manipuler la communauté athlétique sans recours.

Les nouveaux sports amateurs ne peuvent pas évoluer vers les Olympiques sans avoir un espace propice pour se développer où règnent l’ouverture et la justice. Des lois imprécises et ambiguës comme le nouvel article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada paralysent le sport de combat canadien, causant une diminution de la participation et la représentation d'athlètes canadiens aux Jeux Olympiques et autres compétitions internationales. En conséquence, le Canada risque de perdre plusieurs talents canadiens qui iront vers d’autres opportunités où il y aura cette ouverture pour le sport dans d’autres pays. Le développement d’un sport pour l’emmener vers une discipline Olympique et internationale, prend des décennies de travail et de développement. L’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada empêche cette croissance avant même qu'elle ne commence.

L’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada contredit beaucoup l’existence des traditions et façons de faire de longue date autour du MMA au Canada. Le nouvel L’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada découragera un individu de s'associer à une organisation sportive de son choix. En cette forme, L’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada contredit les libertés garanties dans la Charte Canadienne des Droits et Libertés.

En outre, article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada est utilisé comme une arme politique par certaines organisations de sport de combat qui cause l’annulation de plusieurs compétitions au Canada ce qui fait mal au sport du MMA. Actuellement, il y a des organisations sportives provinciales qui sont reconnues en Ontario par le Ministère de la Culture et du Sport. Leur statut de reconnaissance donne accès à ces organismes à des subventions pour financer leur organisation (s).

Une partie de ces fonds est aussi utilisée pour commencer antitrust et des campagnes de propagande contre non-reconnu (et entièrement légal) les organisations sportives qui n'utilisent pas l'argent de Payeur Fiscal pour opérer(fonctionner). Ceux-ci sont des Actes criminels définis conformément à l'Acte(la Loi) de Compétition(Concurrence) du Canada qui est ignoré par la reconnaissance des Ministères. La ligne entre la reconnaissance et S209 ou la section 83 était toujours gardée floue pour diminuer les organisations qui ne sont pas sous le portefeuille de reconnaissance de sport de Ministère.

Le législateur n'a manifestement pas tenu compte des représentations des experts du domaine du sport de combat et a adopté la loi malgré l’opposition des gens d’expérience de ce sport détenant la formation la plus haute et opérant selon les normes de sécurité depuis de nombreuses années. Au lieu de clarifier l’ancien article 83 du Code Criminel traitant de combats concertés, le nouvel article 83. (1) du Code Criminel du Canada a créé une débâcle plus prononcée dans la croissance de Sport amateur de combat.

Arrêter de se renvoyer la balle ! Le combatif industrie du sport s'est accélérée considérablement au cours des 10 dernières années. Accepter notre position et nous aider à "maintenir les combats dans l'anneau".

View petition

14. Fix Bill S209 amendment of Section 83 of the Criminal Code / Corriger le projet de loi S209 "modification de l'article 83 du Code pénal"

ATTN: House of Commons of Canada, Parliament of Canada, Senate of Canada, Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport, Ministry of Consumer Services

-Pleine traduction française ajoutée 11-02-14. Prière de se reporter au texte après version anglaise

English Version;

Municipalities/Permit Departments are denying permits for Amateur Mixed Martial Arts and even Non-Striking Combative Sports events citing S209. The new amendment to section 83 is being used for monopoly control of Tax Payer funds and sports. Senators were warned of this potential misinterpretation and misuse of S209. If unchecked, efforts of aspiring athletes and coaches, as well as long standing organizations that have helped and continue to help grow these sports will be laid to waste. S209 can be used as a blanket permission of monopoly by some who are assigned the rights to manipulate the athletic community, without recourse.

New Sports cannot grow to Olympic heights without an open and fair playing field in the Amateur form. Unfair, ambiguous laws and amendments such as S209 are the suffocating chains surrounding Canadian Combat Sports, choking the participation and representation of Canadian Athletes in the Olympics and other International Competitions. Canada will experience more talent drain as the best of us leave for other Countries and open opportunities. It takes decades to grow a sport into the Olympic and International Platform. S209 blocks that growth before it even begins.

S209 contradicts many pre-existing and long-standing laws in Canada. The new Bill will discourage an individual from associating with a sports organization of his or her choice. In this form, S209 contradicts Canadian Constitutional amendment of Freedom of Association Act of Canada.

Furthermore, S209 is used as a political weapon by organizations in combative sports to ruthlessly hurt and shut-down competing events in Canada. Currently, there are Provincial Sports Organizations who are recognized in Ontario by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. Recognition status gives them access to Tax Payer funds in the form of grants to run their organization(s). A portion of these funds are also used to launch anti-trust and propaganda campaigns against non-recognized (and fully legal) sports organizations that do not use Tax Payer money to operate. These are Criminal Acts defined under the Competition Act of Canada that are ignored by the recognizing Ministries. The line between recognition and S209 or section 83 has always been kept blurred to diminish organizations that are not under the Ministry sports recognition portfolio.

Senators who are no experts in the wide field of Combative Sports simply passed the law despite warnings from individuals and organizations entrenched in regulating these sports with highest training and safety standards for many years. Bill S209 is a Bah! Humbug! to the Canadian Combat Athletic community carrying with it the air of arrogance by the Law Makers who Know Not What They Do. Instead of clarifying section 83 regulations on prize fighting, Bill S209 has created a more pronounced debacle in the growth of Amateur Combat Sports.

Stop passing the buck! The combative sport industry has accelerated tremendously over the past 10 years. Accept our position and assist us in "keeping the fighting in the ring".

Version française;

ATTN: La Chambre des communes du Canada, le Parlement du Canada, le Sénat du Canada, Ministère de Tourisme, Culture et Sport, Ministère de Services aux consommateurs

Les municipalités ainsi que leurs départements qui émettent les permis, citent souvent l’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada pour justifier de ne pas émettre de permis pour les Arts Martiaux Mixtes Amateurs et même pour les évènements de sports de combat dans lesquels il n’y a pas de contacts. Le nouvel article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada est utilisé comme une façon de monopoliser le contrôle des fonds des payeurs de taxes de même que le sport. Les sénateurs ont été avertis du risque potentiel d’interprétation erronée et mauvaise du futur article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada, au moment des discussions entourant l’adoption du projet de loi S209. Hors contrôle, les efforts des aspirants athlètes, des entraîneurs ainsi que des organisations permanentes existant de longue date, qui ont aidé et continuent à aider, à cultiver ce sport, seront voués à l’échec. Les pouvoirs contenus dans le nouvel article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada, sont tellement vastes et confères aux titulaires des droits, des pouvoirs de monopole tellement vastes, qui pourraient être utilisés dans le but de manipuler la communauté athlétique sans recours.

Les nouveaux sports amateurs ne peuvent pas évoluer vers les Olympiques sans avoir un espace propice pour se développer où règnent l’ouverture et la justice. Des lois imprécises et ambiguës comme le nouvel article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada paralysent le sport de combat canadien, causant une diminution de la participation et la représentation d'athlètes canadiens aux Jeux Olympiques et autres compétitions internationales. En conséquence, le Canada risque de perdre plusieurs talents canadiens qui iront vers d’autres opportunités où il y aura cette ouverture pour le sport dans d’autres pays. Le développement d’un sport pour l’emmener vers une discipline Olympique et internationale, prend des décennies de travail et de développement. L’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada empêche cette croissance avant même qu'elle ne commence.

L’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada contredit beaucoup l’existence des traditions et façons de faire de longue date autour du MMA au Canada. Le nouvel L’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada découragera un individu de s'associer à une organisation sportive de son choix. En cette forme, L’article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada contredit les libertés garanties dans la Charte Canadienne des Droits et Libertés .

En outre, article 83. (1) du Code criminel du Canada est utilisé comme une arme politique par certaines organisations de sport de combat qui cause l’annulation de plusieurs compétitions au Canada ce qui fait mal au sport du MMA. Actuellement, il y a des organisations sportives provinciales qui sont reconnues en Ontario par le Ministère de la Culture et du Sport. Leur statut de reconnaissance donne accès à ces organismes à des subventions pour financer leur organisation (s).

Une partie de ces fonds est aussi utilisée pour commencer antitrust et des campagnes de propagande contre non-reconnu (et entièrement légal) les organisations sportives qui n'utilisent pas l'argent de Payeur Fiscal pour opérer(fonctionner). Ceux-ci sont des Actes criminels définis conformément à l'Acte(la Loi) de Compétition(Concurrence) du Canada qui est ignoré par la reconnaissance des Ministères. La ligne entre la reconnaissance et S209 ou la section 83 était toujours gardée floue pour diminuer les organisations qui ne sont pas sous le portefeuille de reconnaissance de sport de Ministère.

Le législateur n'a manifestement pas tenu compte des représentations des experts du domaine du sport de combat et a adopté la loi malgré l’opposition des gens d’expérience de ce sport détenant la formation la plus haute et opérant selon les normes de sécurité depuis de nombreuses années. Au lieu de clarifier l’ancien article 83 du Code Criminel traitant de combats concertés, le nouvel article 83. (1) du Code Criminel du Canada a créé une débâcle plus prononcée dans la croissance de Sport amateur de combat.

Arrêter de se renvoyer la balle ! Le combatif industrie du sport s'est accélérée considérablement au cours des 10 dernières années. Accepter notre position et nous aider à "maintenir les combats dans l'anneau".

View petition

15. Abolish the Goods and Services Tax in Canada.

This is a petition to Abolish the Goods and services tax in Canada.

View petition

16. Keep Justin Bieber in the U.S.

The online-petition of U.S.-Americans is also found on the White house website.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-justin-bieber-and-revoke-his-green-card/ST1yqHJL

View petition

17. Help Change Saskatchewans Boa, Python and Reptile Laws

Saskatchewan has had a law that has ban the ownership of all boas and pythons since 1985. This law is severely outdated and even is worded incorrectly calling that all reptile and amphibians that are venomous are ban as well. However toads are sold in store and other mildly poisonous animals.

This is the only provice in Canada where it is illegal to own boas and pythons. This severely restricts what people can own in Saskatchewan. If any are found to be illegally kept are either found a new home in a zoo out of province by the government or euthanized.


For an exact reading of the law please visit
http://www.canlii.org/en/sk/laws/regu/rrs-c-w-13.1-reg-13/latest/rrs-c-w-13.1-reg-13.html

View petition

18. Bring back Afghan memorial to Australia

The Top Brass in the ADF want to destroy the memorial that is dedicated to the 40 brave men who have paid the ultimate sacrifice in the name of our freedom.

View petition

19. Hey Rogers, How about AMC HD for ALL provinces!

Rogers customers in Ontario have the luxury of having AMC in High Definition which I believe is unfair to the rest of the country. I myself live in New Brunswick and I love AMC and it's quality programming with shows like The Walking Dead, but I find it quite disappointing that we can't get it in HD.

I can only imagine how many other Rogers customers feel for the rest of the country and I'm sure that they all agree with me on this one.

So Rogers, are you going to give us the programming that would help ensure that we stay with your company or let customers leave for another provider?

Let's all brand together to get AMC in HD for ALL provinces!

View petition

20. Stop Prius production

Toyota Prius owners around the world are mostly "nature-friendly" kind of people, and 90% of Prius owners have a Prius because of "save nature" perspective.

What they don't know, is that production of their Prius hurts environment much more than standard petrol/diesel powerd cars do in their whole lifetime. Also, production of Prius goes around the world (ex. Nickel mining, Canada, refining mined Nickel in Europe, further production in China, and sent to Japan where it is fitted into a car). Not mentioning the fact that parts are all being shipped across the globe, and cargo ships are not so nature friendly.

Studies have shown that in a long term, Prius makes more environmental damage than Land Rover Discovery in its whole lifespan.

View petition

21. Have the Ontario Municipal Board be made up of elected officials

The members of the Ontario Municipal Board are appointed by Ontario's Attorney General John Gerretsen. This organization can over rule elected politicians and in turn not follow the will of the people.

Members of the OMB should be elected to ensure they are accountable to the people.

View petition

22. Remove The Vehicle Age From Import Laws

Canada and the US have laws that prevent people from importing cars until they are a certain age.

Most of Canada has a requirement for the vehicle to be over 15 years old.

What is the point of this law?

View petition

23. Stop Scotiabank and the City Of Toronto from Stealing Our Festival

The Caribana™ Carnival in Toronto was created in 1967 by the Caribana™ Cultural Committee (C.C.C), now known as the Caribana™ Arts Group (C.A.G.). It is the largest cultural festival in North America and was created to commemorate Canada’s centennial independence celebration, by a group of West Indian immigrants living in Ontario, Canada.

Throughout the years, the founders made tremendous sacrifices to keep the festival alive despite the many adversities they faced, including bankruptcy. Others even lost their homes as a result of repossession by financial institutions when they could not repay the loan borrowed to run the festival. Needless to say, the Caribana™ creators got little or no financial help from the City of Toronto or any government entity when they started, which continued for many years. Despite their many pitfalls and lack of funding, the founders still held on to their visions and dreams and continued to risk all they had to ensure the Caribbean culture was showcased during the summer months when the festival called Caribana™ was held.

Ironically, the festival has now been usurped by one of Canada’s largest financial institution called Scotiabank, and the City of Toronto, through one of the city’s management company call the Festival Management Committee (F.M.C). The takeover was arranged when the City of Toronto, in 2006, offered to assist the C.C.C. with expertise advise in areas they were lacking. This arrangement was accepted when the C.C.C experienced certain challenges, some of which resulted from inadequate funding, so they thought this gesture was genuine and in good faith. Eventually the C.C.C agreed to allow the FMC to manage the festival for a year and helped augment their operations. Afterwards, the festival was to be returned to the C.C.C. management control, but this did not happen.
The C.A.G has requested the return of the festival many times or asked the FMC to enter into a licensing agreement, but their requests have been ignored by a group some people in the community have labeled “the de facto group.” Subsequently, the C.A.G took the initiative to pursue legal action to reclaim the festival and in May 2011, the Ontario Superior Court ruled the name Caribana ™ is a trademark that could no longer be used by Scotiabank and the FMC. With that ruling, the “de facto group” was forced to change the name and renamed it Scotiabank Toronto Caribbean Carnival.

An article in the Toronto Star in May 2011, stated, “An Ipsos Reid study released April (2010) showed Caribana generated $483 million for the provincial economy in 2009, drawing about 1.2 million festival-goers, including 300,000 from outside the country.” Maybe, the biggest question that needs to be answered is, who requested this study? Was it because of these astounding figures, Scotiabank and the City of Toronto do not want to return the festival to its rightful owners? After managing the festival successfully for almost 40 years, why do the City of Toronto, Scotiabank and the FMC now believe C.A.G is incompetent to manage it?

There is no doubt the festival belongs to the C.A.G, who demonstrated resilience throughout the years in promoting the Caribbean culture, even during the most tumultuous times. Scotiabank, by virtue of their actions, seems to be exercising organizational colonialism, which must be condemned. This is an unprecedented action taken by a large city in an advance democratic country. Where is Scotiabank and the City of Toronto ethics and social responsibly?

If anyone was to take away any property of Scotiabank or the City of Toronto, they might be charged for illegal possession of the property and possibly called a thief. Why does Scotiabank believe after all the sacrifices made over the years by members of the Caribana™ Arts Group and the Caribbean Community, the City of Toronto now has the right to take their festival away and let them claim it as their own? Hmm…Bully? Furthermore, under any other circumstances would this not be considered stealing?

View petition

24. Stop the use of herbicides in Canadian forests

Chemicals do not belong in Canadian forest. For many years, The government of canada has allowed forestry companies as well as the Ministry Of Natural Resources to use approved herbicides to manage forests.

Many people feel that this practice has negative effects on wildlife and ecosystems. Soil fertility depends on living organisms that these chemicals will eliminate.

View petition

25. Establish a CANZUK political & defence alliance and free trade zone by 2020

In recognition of the reality that the UK will almost certainly recast its relationship with the EU to avoid falling into an inevitable supranational federation;

And in respect of the fact that the UK values its freedom and political independence as much as Canada, Australia and New Zealand (CANZ) does—nations that share a common language, common values, common law, common institutions, a common political culture, a common military heritage, a common history and a common head of state, HM the Queen;

And in recognition of the fact that the individual nations of CANZUK require a vision for the 21st century that is cooperative and global in nature, one that is able to leverage its values and strengths in order to best compete with the emerging giants of the world who may not share those values;

And in acknowledgement of the fact that much could be gained for the prosperity, mobility, protection and freedom of our citizens if our nations, for example:

- Established a free trade zone
- Created a dedicated channel for arrival and departure at all ports of entry to allow subjects of Her Majesty’s realms to enter with appropriate decorum and not as “foreigners”
- Increased sharing of embassies and missions around the world to build on the agreements that have already and recently been made to better protect our citizens abroad
- Pooled procurement in defence spending and other large government procurement items to achieve economies of scale and reduce costs on taxpayers
- Caucused in the UN as a geopolitical group (as much as CANZ currently does) and rotated chairmanship of the UK’s permanent seat on the UN Security Council

View petition

26. Open Carry in Ontario

Open carry will mean a safer more independent Canada.

Permits and courses will generate millions in revenue.

View petition

27. Stop Genetically Engineered Seed problems

The use of GE (genetically engineered, or GMO genetically modified organism) crops has been a growing issue of contention in recent years. Health, agricultural and environmental advocates are pushing for more testing, mandatory labeling of GE products, and ultimately the banning of GE products completely.

The articles below reference Monsanto Canada's announcement in June, that it will expand its products further into Western Canada. Monsanto has indicated that genetically engineered foods will solve world hunger. One article reassures that crop yields are only lower than traditional methods, when farmers use the product incorrectly. However, other independent studies show crops produce lower yield when the farmer uses it right as well. It is also well documented that the issues of world hunger are not due to a lack of food, but in the political and distribution systems that manage food security.

Still, seeds are genetically engineered with pesticides, while farmers, beekeepers, consumers, wildlife, the environment, and our future, all stand to be devastated.

Up until now, governments, and industry (such as Monsanto, Bayer, Dow, Syngenta), have argued that genetically modified foods and products are safe. However, independent studies and testing have proven they are not.

Labelling is required. We continue to eat GM foods daily without knowing it because most products in our grocery stores include genetically modified ingredients, and are not labelled, which deters freedom of choice.

A monopoly of the world's food system should not be allowed. Five companies account for 58 percent of the world’s commercial seed sales and ownership of seed is patented. These patents mean farmers cannot save seed for future plantings, so they lose autonomy and we all lose biodiversity forever. Once we lose diverse species of crops, we cannot undo this. Also, when small organic farmers' crops are contaminated by Monsanto's genetically engineered patented material (brought on the wind or by pollinating insects), the farmer is bullied in court for years by big business, and held liable for large sums of money small farmers don't have. It doesn't help that crop yields can decrease and the environment suffers when soil degrades irreparably. Globally, farmer suicide deaths have risen dramatically as a direct result of all these stressors.

We have seen the tragic effects in the decrease of the bee species, bees that our children and grandchildren rely on for future biodiversity on earth.

The evidence and support against GMOs (GE) are mounting.

It seems farmers, but perhaps few other people, may be aware how aggressive Monsanto is going after Canadian agricultural profits. We need to be aware so we can act accordingly before it is too late. I am hopeful that in addition to accepting my letter for publication, that your media outlet could do a corresponding piece on this new announcement. Thanks in advance for covering this very important local, Canadian and global story.

Public outcry DOES work. It is reported that Monsanto contracts the mercenary firm "Blackwater", to track activists around the world; Monsanto has seen the results when the people band together to voice concern. Due to overwhelming concern expressed by farmers, consumers, and public health officials, governments are beginning to require review of herbicide-resistant pesticides and genetic engineering of crops. Many countries in the world, and some US states, have banned GEGMO altogether, or until independent testing and peer review is sufficiently completed. Canada is lagging.

Canadians must continue to lobby Health Canada. Our government claims GMO products are safe, based on the thin and biased research of the big five companies who stand to profit. We need to demand independent GM product product testing be started in Canada. Canadians have the human right to choose what we put in our bodies, and for the due diligence of our government to do the testing in labs, and not use the general Canadian population as guinea pigs.

Canadians must continue to tell the big five, and the companies who allow their products to be ingredients in their products, that they must stop their Orwellian control over the world food system. We must demand they stop lobbying 'against' GMO labelling, and 'against' us, the 83% of the general populace who are lobbying 'for' labelling. We must demand they start labelling. It is our human right to not be monopolized by corporations, and to have choice.

Canadians should be encouraged to write their MP, MPP and PM. Politicians do handle letters and respond to media attention of issues. Also, Canadians can strengthen the collective public voice, by taking part in events like the July 24th "Monsanto Video Revolt", and October “March Against Monsanto". These events take place around the world, as coordinated days of action and protest. They rally calls for further scientific research on the health effects of GE foods, for the labelling of Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) foods we eat daily, and ultimately for a complete ban on GE crops. These awareness events also educate people so they can make their own decisions; Canadians can use their dollars to vote non-GMO when they buy organic non-GMO instead.

We must continue to fight for our freedom; and can not allow these multinational chemical companies' to continue dominating the world's food supply, and literally forcing it down our throats!

Sincerely,

concerned citizen

Article Reference: http://www.monsanto.ca/newsviews/Pages/NR-2013-06-24.aspx

Article Reference: http://www.monsanto.ca/newsviews/Pages/NR-2013-04-08.aspx

View petition

28. Stop Language Tests For Canadian University Graduates

About 300,000 people apply for immigration to Canada every year.

Under the Canadian Experience or Skilled Worker Class, Immigration Canada requires all applicants to take Language proficiency test, even those who have graduated with Bachelors, Masters or PhD degrees (even in English Literature) from recognized Canadian Universities.

The tests (IELTS, CELPIP, TEF) cost about $250 before tax & are often booked up well in advance, rendering the application process more expensive and needlessly cumbersome.

View petition

29. Appreciation letter: Urging the Honorable John Baird to support Iranian Opposition


در پاسخ به محکوم کردن انتصابات حکومت توسط وزیر خارجه کانادا در بیانیه ۱۵ ژوئن ۲۰۱۳ و حمایت وی از مردم ایران، بدینوسیله از پشتیبانی عالیجناب جان برد تقدیر میگردد. وزیر خارجه کانادا در بیانیه خویش تصریح کرده بود که هر چند کانادا مدت مدیدی است که اعتقاد و اعتماد خویش را از رژیم توخالی و واپسگرای ایران از دست داده اما هیچگاه ایمان خویش نسبت به مردم ایران را از دست نداده است. با امضا و به اشتراک گذاشتن این نامه، قدردانی خود را از حامیان ملت ایران نشان دهیم:


John Baird, the Foreign Minister, who has openly advocated democratic revolution in Iran since closing Canada’s embassy there last year, said in a statement the election was “effectively meaningless” because only “regime-friendly candidates” were allowed in the race, and none “represents a real alternative for Iranian voters.”

“The person tagged to replace [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad will simply be another of [Supreme Leader] Ayatollah Khamenei’s puppets in the tragic and dangerous pantomime that is life for all Iranians,” he said.

http://www.international.gc.ca/wet30-1/aff/news-communiques/2013/06/15a.aspx?lang=eng

View petition

30. Protect Wolves by Canadian Federal Law

Before the Europeans came to Canada, wolves lived in harmony with the environment. But, when the settlers arrived, wolves were poisoned, trapped, and hunted.

Wolves that weren't attacked, were left homeless when their forest home was developed. With the largest wolf population in the world, Canada has allot to up-hold. People come here for the wilderness, and, with the wolf as the primary symbol, no one will come, and, as well as having less income, the country could be responsible for a huge decline in the population of the wolf.

Canada should also be ashamed that with the Rocky Mountains being the best possible habitat in Canada for a wolf, there was not one spotted in that area over a 30 year time period.

View petition