STOP FORCED ADOPTION AND REMOVAL OF CHILDREN FROM PARENTS

IN THE U.K THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN TAKEN EACH YEAR FROM LOVING PARENTS AND ARE PLACED INTO THE CARE OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY OR ARE TAKEN AND PLACED FOR ADOPTION. THE GROUNDS ARE USUALLY HISTORICAL MISUSE OF DRUGS/VOLATILE RELATIONSHIPS OR THEY ARE TOOK AS IN THE FUTURE THEY ARE LIKELY TO BE AT RISK.

THIS 'EMOTIONAL ABUSE' AS IT IS CALLED, IS ONLY USED HERE IN THE UK, OTHER COUNTRIES REFUSE TO CATEGORISE EMOTIONAL UNDER THE ABUSE OF CHILDREN, AND TO TAKE THEM AS 'IN THE FUTURE' THEY COULD BE AT RISK... THE EMOTIONAL ABUSE THE CHILD SUFFERS IS AT THE HANDS OF THE LA FOR REMOVING THE CHILD FROM THE PARENTS, THIS CAUSES THE CHILD AND THE PARENTS EMOTIONAL ABUSE, AND THE LA NEED TO BE CHARGED THEMSELVES WITH THIS.

THESE CHILDREN ARE TAKEN FROM BIRTH MOST OF THEM AND ARE THEN PLACED UP FOR ADOPTION..THIS IS NOT TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN - BUT FOR THEM TO MEET THEIR TARGETS TO ENABLE THE LA TO RECEIVE GRANTS AND PUBLIC FUNDING - ILLEGAL CHILD TRAFFICKING. A SOCIAL WORKER WHO REMOVES 2 CHILDREN FROM A FAMILY HOME, IS SEEN TO BE MEETING TARGETS, A SOCIAL WORKER WHO HELPS 2 FAMILIES TO KEEP THEIR CHILDREN, IS DEEMED AS LAZY AND NOT DOING HIS JOB, IF A CHILD IS ABLE TO STAY WITH PARENTS BUT REQUIRES SOME ASSISTANCE...THERE IS VERY LIMITED FUNDING FOR THIS, FOR PARENTS WHOSE CHILDREN ARE ONLY CHILDREN IN NEED.

THE FUNDING IS HIGHER FOR CHILDREN AT RISK, CHILDREN ON PROTECTION ORDERS, SO INSTEAD OF HELPING A FAMILY IT BECOMES APPLAUDED AND PRAISED IF THE CHILDREN ARE INSTEAD REMOVED AND FOSTERED AS THEY ARE THEN ELIGIBLE FOR FUNDING AS A DEPARTMENT.