- Target:
- CAFCASS, DfE, Royal Courts, Family Court, NSPCC, FNF
- Region:
- United Kingdom
- Website:
- www.parentalalienation.org.uk
Closed. Petition has moved.
Many parents lose contact with their children every day, simply because many professionals in the family courts fail to protect one or both parents from the other or other professional that have a hidden agendas. Many lies are told by CAFCASS and the resident parent. In all cases the courts choose to believe CAFCASS while refusing to accept evidence ageists CAFCASS.
In “Criminal Court” a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty, however in family law, it is “Guilty till proven innocent” The court makes rulings on the “balance of probabilities” in other words “anything is possible” however most are found “guilty” with no evidence. If the same allegations were made in criminal court, evidence would be examined and false allegation would be held in contempt. The family courts believe it is in the best interest of the child to believe the residential parent so not to find them in contempt. Any allegations or evidence provided in court by the non-resident parent is over looked or refused.
This allows animosity and a difficult relationship between both parents which is detrimental to the child.
A BETTER PARENTHOOD for a BETTER CHiLDHOOD
This Petition is for the following changes to be made to allow an even and fair playing field in the family Courts. These changes will deter gross-misconduct and corruption where judges already swear on an oath of fairness and justice without prejudices.
1) Default start of 50/50 residences for children over the age of one (open to compromise under mediation)
Some solicitors advise and coach the resident parent to stop contact with the child knowing full well of the stress, financial loss and animosity that it causes…
2) Introduction of specific Parental Alienation indicators and repercussions to be acknowledged and enforced by the courts as it is in other countries.
Parental Alienation is a form of child abuse. Using the child as a weapon to punish the other parent. CAFCASS and the courts are aware of Parental Alienation and the damage it causes, but choose to ignore it, stating “it is in the child’s best interest”…
3) Remove the “balance of probabilities” (guilty until proven innocent) only where cases go to criminal court can directions be made on child access.
This is the sole reason why the residential parent is usually coached to make false or exaggerated allegations. It takes at least 3-5 court hearings to come to the conclusion, that most if not all allegations are in the favour of the residential parent. There is usually an appeal which results in another 2-3 court hearings, all of which seem to be set up to make money while destroying any relationship of maintaining a good parental partnership...
4) All interviews with CAFCASS to be voice recorded and relied on in court.
This will prevent the countless allegations of numerous CAFCASS officers lying in court. Why do there NOT recorded such important interviews? Why do they make no attempt to protect themselves if allegations of them lying are false?
It is financially in the best interest of others to create animosity between each parent, all while ignoring what is in the “CHiLD’s best interest”
The Review Children, Family Court Corruption petition to CAFCASS, DfE, Royal Courts, Family Court, NSPCC, FNF was written by Paul Archer and is in the category Children's Rights at GoPetition.